Prev: Obama bashing and AVLV
Next: Lesson time again
From: tom ronson on 16 Jul 2010 14:13
Las Vegas Don wrote:

> Don Elton John, Saturday Night is Alright for Fighting. And don't
> you dare to go to www.limewire.com. Someone may look at you real hard
> and think something ba-a-a-a-a-a-a-ad! ooooooo, I am so scared.

you should be scared --- but you're not so that speaks more to you than
other people. There are a lot of alternatives --- but if you want to
keep playing Russian roulette with your computer that's fine. Perhaps
you'll knock yourself off the air and we'll all win.

we can only hope.

--

--tr
From: tom ronson on 16 Jul 2010 14:14
Las Vegas Don wrote:

> He wins by such razor thin margins that he should be scared....

I've pointed this out to you before so I don't expect this post to clear
your clouded and very inaccurate thinking.

United States Senate election in Nevada, 1986[7]:

* Harry Reid (D) - 130,955 (50.00%)
* James Santini (R) - 116,606 (44.52%)
* None of the Above - 9,472 (3.62%)
* H. Kent Cromwell (LBT) - 4,899 (1.87%)

Democratic primary for the United States Senate from Nevada, 1992[8]:

* Harry Reid (inc.) - 64,828 (52.82%)
* Charles Woods - 48,364 (39.40%)
* None of These Candidates - 4,429 (3.61%)
* Norman E. Hollingsworth - 3,253 (2.65%)
* God Almighty (actually Emil Tolotti Jr.) - 1,869 (1.52%)

United States Senate election in Nevada 1992[9]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 253,150 (51.05%)
* Demar Dahl (R) - 199,413 (40.21%)
* None of the Above - 13,154 (2.65%)
* Joe S. Garcia, Sr. (Independent American) - 11,240 (2.27%)
* Lois Avery (Natural Law) - 7,279 (1.47%)
* H. Kent Cromwell (LBT) - 7,222 (1.46%)
* Harry Tootle (Populist) - 4,429 (0.89%)

United States Senate election in Nevada, 1998[10]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 208,650 (47.88%)
* John Ensign (R) - 208,222 (47.78%)
* None of the Above - 8,125 (1.86%)
* Michael Cloud (LBT) - 8,044 (1.85%)
* Michael E. Williams (Natural Law) - 2,749 (0.63%)

United States Senate election in Nevada, 2004[11]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 494,805 (61.08%)
* Richard Ziser (R) - 284,640 (35.14%)
* None of the Above - 12,968 (1.60%)
* Tom Hurst (LBT) - 9,559 (1.18%)
* David K. Schumann (Independent American) - 6,001 (0.74%)
* Gary Marinch (Natural Law) - 2,095 (0.26%)


so, in just one of his races (1998) he won by a "razor thin" margin. the
rest have been very comfortable wins.

> This last election he needed organised assistance to get where he is.

what do you think Angle is relying on with the Tea Bag -- erm, Tea
Party? If she had to go it alone she wouldn't get 5% of the vote. Nope,
she's got to rely on irrational morons such as yourself.

> He'll more than likely loose on his own merits this time around.

He'll win by a large margin after Angle gets her 39% of the votes.

--

--tr
From: tom ronson on 16 Jul 2010 14:17
Las Vegas Don wrote:

> Politicians have no "fiduciary responsibilities".

lol --- nice one, Donnie.

> Am I a senic.

I have no idea.

--

--tr
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Obama bashing and AVLV
Next: Lesson time again