BA overbooking - a bad experience
in [Airline Travel]
|
Prev: Jews Strive To Restore Christmas Trees At Seattle Airport
Next: United Mileage Plus mystery terms
From: VS on 2 Mar 2007 22:11 In article <1172890910.899085.80820(a)t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>, js <jonathansmith99(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>It's not mutually exclusive. In the U.S. Southwest and AirTran are low >>>cost carriers but aren't that bad in service. Southwest even allows 3 >>>checked bags. >> >>... and their seat pitch is *better* than legacy carriers'. > >32 and 17 width As opposed to 31 on United, Continental, Northwest and such. >>the economy seats on Southwest are better than some airlines' >>first-class seats. > >Nope. Yep.
From: js on 2 Mar 2007 22:37 On Mar 2, 7:11 pm, s...(a)xenon.Stanford.EDU (VS) wrote: > In article <1172890910.899085.80...(a)t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>, > > js <jonathansmit...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>It's not mutually exclusive. In the U.S. Southwest and AirTran are low > >>>cost carriers but aren't that bad in service. Southwest even allows 3 > >>>checked bags. > > >>... and their seat pitch is *better* than legacy carriers'. > > >32 and 17 width > > As opposed to 31 on United, Continental, Northwest and such. The UAL 300's have 32/17 Continental is 31/17.2 in their 737 series Northwest doesn't have 737s in the fleet but 757 varies between 31 and 33 with 17.2 width. > > >>the economy seats on Southwest are better than some airlines' > >>first-class seats. > > >Nope. > > Yep. UAL FC 38/20.5 and Prem Econ 34/17 in the 737-5's Contiental FC 38/21 Northwest FC 37/21 Now go away. js
From: Mike Hunt on 3 Mar 2007 02:09 VS wrote: > In article <t1ehu2pcq1lqpedlklqeb2n1cn40kmkk3u(a)4ax.com>, > Brian <drmorrisnospam(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > >>It's not mutually exclusive. In the U.S. Southwest and AirTran are low >>cost carriers but aren't that bad in service. Southwest even allows 3 >>checked bags. > > > ... and their seat pitch is *better* than legacy carriers'. In fact, > the economy seats on Southwest are better than some airlines' > first-class seats. Can you document this, because I extremely doubt it.
From: Mike Hunt on 3 Mar 2007 02:10 VS wrote: > In article <1172890910.899085.80820(a)t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>, > js <jonathansmith99(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>It's not mutually exclusive. In the U.S. Southwest and AirTran are low >>>>cost carriers but aren't that bad in service. Southwest even allows 3 >>>>checked bags. >>> >>>... and their seat pitch is *better* than legacy carriers'. >> >>32 and 17 width > > > As opposed to 31 on United, Continental, Northwest and such. > > >>>the economy seats on Southwest are better than some airlines' >>>first-class seats. >> >>Nope. > > > Yep. What carriers have less than 32 inches of pitch in FIRST CLASS?
From: VS on 3 Mar 2007 02:59
In article <1172893024.178540.143750(a)t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>, js <jonathansmith99(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>It's not mutually exclusive. In the U.S. Southwest and AirTran are low >>>>>cost carriers but aren't that bad in service. Southwest even allows 3 >>>>>checked bags. >> >>>>... and their seat pitch is *better* than legacy carriers'. >> >> >32 and 17 width >> >> As opposed to 31 on United, Continental, Northwest and such. > >The UAL 300's have 32/17 31 on the UAL's 320s - worse than Southwest. >Continental is 31/17.2 in their 737 series Worse than Southwest. >Northwest doesn't have 737s in the fleet but 757 varies between 31 and >33 with 17.2 width. As little as 30 on the 319s - worse than Southwest. >>>>the economy seats on Southwest are better than some airlines' ^^^^ >>>>first-class seats. > >UAL FC 38/20.5 and Prem Econ 34/17 in the 737-5's >Contiental FC 38/21 >Northwest FC 37/21 Son, is English your native tongue? I highlighted the relevant word above to aid your comprehension. Think about this, then get lost. |