Prev: If my dreams came true
Next: The future of single-occupancy cabins
From: Charles on 10 Aug 2010 12:46
Stu <stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:35:16 -0400, Charles
> <fort(a)his.com.remove.invalid> wrote:
>
>> In article <ul6166td1gv82privcetnhq7o0ol5eu223(a)4ax.com>, Stu
>> <stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Can't really blame Carnival when the problem was the NYC hooligans.
>>
>> NYC hooligans.......that is a leap.
>>
>> Doesn't Carnival bill their ships as the "Fun" ships?
>
> Now there's a stretch even for you

Huh? You don't see their advertising? You are not aware of Carnival's
reputation? I am not saying their reputation is deserved but the
description of the sailing by Tom W sounds like what people always said
about Carnival. Your posting that it was NYC hooligans is the stretch. I
have sailed out of New York City many times. On Princess, Celebrity, NCL
and HAL. Also New Jersey on Celebrity and RCI. Never had any hooligans
or a sailing that was rowdy.

--
Charles
From: Tom K on 10 Aug 2010 13:01
On 8/10/10 12:46 PM, Charles wrote:
> Stu<stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:35:16 -0400, Charles
>> <fort(a)his.com.remove.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> In article<ul6166td1gv82privcetnhq7o0ol5eu223(a)4ax.com>, Stu
>>> <stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can't really blame Carnival when the problem was the NYC hooligans.
>>>
>>> NYC hooligans.......that is a leap.
>>>
>>> Doesn't Carnival bill their ships as the "Fun" ships?
>>
>> Now there's a stretch even for you
>
> Huh? You don't see their advertising? You are not aware of Carnival's
> reputation? I am not saying their reputation is deserved but the
> description of the sailing by Tom W sounds like what people always said
> about Carnival. Your posting that it was NYC hooligans is the stretch. I
> have sailed out of New York City many times. On Princess, Celebrity, NCL
> and HAL. Also New Jersey on Celebrity and RCI. Never had any hooligans
> or a sailing that was rowdy.
>

At the Introduction of Cruise Officers:


And Your "Fun Ship" Cruise Director...
from Seaside Heights NJ.... Snooki
From: Stu on 10 Aug 2010 13:42
On 10 Aug 2010 16:46:04 GMT, Charles <fort(a)his.com.remove.invalid>
wrote:

>Stu <stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:35:16 -0400, Charles
>> <fort(a)his.com.remove.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <ul6166td1gv82privcetnhq7o0ol5eu223(a)4ax.com>, Stu
>>> <stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can't really blame Carnival when the problem was the NYC hooligans.
>>>
>>> NYC hooligans.......that is a leap.
>>>
>>> Doesn't Carnival bill their ships as the "Fun" ships?
>>
>> Now there's a stretch even for you
>
>Huh? You don't see their advertising? You are not aware of Carnival's
>reputation? I am not saying their reputation is deserved but the
>description of the sailing by Tom W sounds like what people always said
>about Carnival. Your posting that it was NYC hooligans is the stretch. I
>have sailed out of New York City many times. On Princess, Celebrity, NCL
>and HAL. Also New Jersey on Celebrity and RCI. Never had any hooligans
>or a sailing that was rowdy.

Maybe Tom was just unlucky. I've sailed Carnival and never ran into
this ever, so it has to be the group from NYC with the wrist bands who
were the hooligans.
From: Stu on 10 Aug 2010 13:43
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:01:38 -0400, Tom K <tkanitra(a)optonline.net>
wrote:

>On 8/10/10 12:46 PM, Charles wrote:
>> Stu<stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:35:16 -0400, Charles
>>> <fort(a)his.com.remove.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article<ul6166td1gv82privcetnhq7o0ol5eu223(a)4ax.com>, Stu
>>>> <stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can't really blame Carnival when the problem was the NYC hooligans.
>>>>
>>>> NYC hooligans.......that is a leap.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't Carnival bill their ships as the "Fun" ships?
>>>
>>> Now there's a stretch even for you
>>
>> Huh? You don't see their advertising? You are not aware of Carnival's
>> reputation? I am not saying their reputation is deserved but the
>> description of the sailing by Tom W sounds like what people always said
>> about Carnival. Your posting that it was NYC hooligans is the stretch. I
>> have sailed out of New York City many times. On Princess, Celebrity, NCL
>> and HAL. Also New Jersey on Celebrity and RCI. Never had any hooligans
>> or a sailing that was rowdy.
>>
>
>At the Introduction of Cruise Officers:
>
>
>And Your "Fun Ship" Cruise Director...
>from Seaside Heights NJ.... Snooki

Newjoisey ??
From: Tom K on 10 Aug 2010 14:03
On 8/10/10 1:43 PM, Stu wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:01:38 -0400, Tom K<tkanitra(a)optonline.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/10/10 12:46 PM, Charles wrote:
>>> Stu<stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:35:16 -0400, Charles
>>>> <fort(a)his.com.remove.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article<ul6166td1gv82privcetnhq7o0ol5eu223(a)4ax.com>, Stu
>>>>> <stu(a)foodforu.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Can't really blame Carnival when the problem was the NYC hooligans.
>>>>>
>>>>> NYC hooligans.......that is a leap.
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't Carnival bill their ships as the "Fun" ships?
>>>>
>>>> Now there's a stretch even for you
>>>
>>> Huh? You don't see their advertising? You are not aware of Carnival's
>>> reputation? I am not saying their reputation is deserved but the
>>> description of the sailing by Tom W sounds like what people always said
>>> about Carnival. Your posting that it was NYC hooligans is the stretch. I
>>> have sailed out of New York City many times. On Princess, Celebrity, NCL
>>> and HAL. Also New Jersey on Celebrity and RCI. Never had any hooligans
>>> or a sailing that was rowdy.
>>>
>>
>> At the Introduction of Cruise Officers:
>>
>>
>> And Your "Fun Ship" Cruise Director...
>>from Seaside Heights NJ.... Snooki
>
> Newjoisey ??

Nope... here it's just JerZee. Like in JerZee Shore. We don't go to
the beach. We go "down the shore".



First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: If my dreams came true
Next: The future of single-occupancy cabins