From: Ray Goldenberg on 4 Feb 2010 11:46 On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:10:04 -0600, Stu <info(a)foodforyou.ca> wrote: > >I've been thinking as to when she told me, and we went on Valor Feb. >2007, she told me in the fall. So it wasn't 14 months as I originally >thought, but almost 27 months ago. Why did you state she was wrong >when the evidence clearly shows otherwise? Hi Stu, You asked this question in 2010: > Is there any truth in the story going around that Carnival is going to > be changing Princess now that they own them? Then you state: > I was told about it approx. 14 months > ago, seems it had been in the works for awhile. I believe Kurt is correct, your Canadian calendar is "different" than ours. <:+) -- Ray Goldenberg 800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905 Lighthouse Travel http://www.lighthousetravel.com Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/lighthousetravl Follow us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/ray.goldenberg
From: Stu on 4 Feb 2010 14:00 On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:46:09 -0800, Ray Goldenberg <ray(a)lighthousetravel.com> wrote: >On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:10:04 -0600, Stu <info(a)foodforyou.ca> wrote: > >> >>I've been thinking as to when she told me, and we went on Valor Feb. >>2007, she told me in the fall. So it wasn't 14 months as I originally >>thought, but almost 27 months ago. Why did you state she was wrong >>when the evidence clearly shows otherwise? > >Hi Stu, > >You asked this question in 2010: Actually it was today > >> Is there any truth in the story going around that Carnival is going to >> be changing Princess now that they own them? > >Then you state: > >> I was told about it approx. 14 months >> ago, seems it had been in the works for awhile. > >I believe Kurt is correct, your Canadian calendar is "different" than >ours. <:+) I asked Kath, she has a better memory than me. Lucy mention the sale Sept.2007 Oct.07- Jan.2010=28 months.. I stand corrected
From: Surfer E2468 on 4 Feb 2010 17:41 Yes,there is truth in the fact that princess is changing now that carnival has them,have noticed a marked difference in our last cruise in november on princess,not the same quality as it once was. cruise lover(~~~~~) ..
From: Becca on 5 Feb 2010 12:13 Charles wrote: > I also have been on one Carnival cruise. I did not like the smokey > ship, the decor, the pool deck and I despised the singing waiters. > Ditto that stupid booth in the dining room. On the other hand the food > was great. Also the ship was not dirty. > > But I do see a reason to go on Carnival. Our Viking group is doing the > Valor this year. While I don't care for Carnival and would not normally > book it there are things more important than not liking a cruise line. Carnival is not my favorite cruise line, I think Celebrity or Royal Caribbean is, but each cruise line has their advantages. The singing waiters gets old. Since the new cruisers enjoy it, I try to tolerate it, but I do not like my ice cream melting while they sing "O Sole Mio". On Carnival, the only areas that were smoky to me, was the casino, so I don't go there. Some of the lounges get smoky, but they do have non-smoking lounges. As the years go by, the smoking areas on cruise ships get fewer and fewer. Remember when you could smoke in the buffet or the restaurant on a cruise ship? When you are traveling with friends and family, the ship becomes less important. The joy is seeing each other, having fun, talking about old times and making new memories. This is what makes the Viking group so much fun, regardless of the ship. I will be cruising on the Triumph out of New Orleans in May, during Mother's Day week. It is all about seeing everybody, meeting for dinner, having fun on Bourbon Street, having a good time on the cruise. I will go diving in Roatan and anybody who wants to join me, can. You could go snorkeling if you don't want to go diving. This should be a fun cruise. Becca
From: Becca on 5 Feb 2010 12:25
Stu wrote: > Well since you asked Ray, I live in a large block with a great deal of > seniors. About 90% cruise, they mostly use Cunard, Holland, Oceania , > Norwegian, and quite a few take Princess because they cater to the > older population. I'm apprised weekly of how great they treat seniors, > I mention Carnival and they say it's for family's with kids. Like you > said, it's our preference after all we pay the bill. > The average age on Princess is probably younger than you think. IMO, the cruise line for people with children of all ages is Royal Caribbean. They have more activities for young folks. Becca |