Clinton nobodies still interrupt air traffic
in [Airline Travel]
|
Prev: Enjoy India Vacations with Tailor-made Travel packages
Next: Red sea snorkeling tour ,full day sea trip excursion by boat to ras Mohammed national park from sharm el sheikh hotels
From: Hatunen on 29 Jul 2010 22:43 On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:20:44 -0400, Brian <drmorrisnospam(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:56:13 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> >wrote: > >>Even thought Chelsea and Bill Clinton are of no importance to national >>security and Hilary is too unimportant to matter, the FAA is still restricting >>flights over the wedding site of what's-her-name: >> >>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/29/air-traffic-restricted-for-chelsea-clinton-wedding > >Soros needs to be protected. I suspect it's more to protect the planes and to protect the guests from falling airplanes. Otherwise the sky will be filled with paparazzi getting in each other's way. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Jim Logajan on 29 Jul 2010 22:55 george <gblack(a)hnpl.net> wrote: > On Jul 30, 8:05�am, "Runge 124" <phi...(a)bigfoot.com> wrote: >> Where's the problem you're not over there >> > Careful. > > Dudley Henriques is protecting Mixedup (a nonpilot posting in a pilot > forum/group) for no discernible reason. I believe you are misreading or misunderstanding Dudley's posts to this thread. Also note that the thread is cross-posted to two groups, only one of which references piloting.
From: Mxsmanic on 29 Jul 2010 23:50 JohnT writes: > I assume that, as you are a long-time resident of France, it is French > national security to which you refer. Your assumption is incorrect.
From: Mxsmanic on 29 Jul 2010 23:51 Hatunen writes: > I suspect it's more to protect the planes and to protect the > guests from falling airplanes. Otherwise the sky will be filled > with paparazzi getting in each other's way. Do paparazzi really care about Chelsea Clinton? Have you seen what she looks like these days?
From: Kurt Ullman on 30 Jul 2010 07:42
In article <c1j456puhjba5pa9orhhnb2ip036vmq7g6(a)4ax.com>, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hatunen writes: > > > I suspect it's more to protect the planes and to protect the > > guests from falling airplanes. Otherwise the sky will be filled > > with paparazzi getting in each other's way. > > Do paparazzi really care about Chelsea Clinton? Have you seen what she looks > like these days? You obviously haven't seen the US news shows gushing over "The closest we come to American Royalty" (and you though the British had a low threshold for Royalty) and a couple have actually called this the equivalent of Charles and Diana (with your comment above, I am assuming that Chelsea in this case is playing the part of Charles- grin). Besides it isn't about Chelsea, it is about Bill and Hill. THAT, along with the likely guest list, would bring the paparazzi out in force. -- I want to find a voracious, small-minded predator and name it after the IRS. Robert Bakker, paleontologist |