From: Wingnut on
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:52:03 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

> Wingnut writes:
>
>> True, but not relevant to this discussion. Your disagreement had been
>> obvious, indeed blindingly so.
>
> Disagreement is not animosity.

It is when one side starts telling the world that the other side is an
idiot, or worse.

>> Even though I've been reposting it several times a week lately partly
>> just to nettle you?
>
> If I read your posts at all, I generally scan them quickly.

Well, there's your mistake then, right there! For each post, you should
either read it thoroughly, for comprehension, or else not post a followup
to it.

>> Neither am I. Hasn't apparently stopped you flooding that newsgroup
>> with a lot of posts on the topic, though.
>
> I just click on the reply button.

Indiscriminately, it seems. Perhaps a Tourette's tic in your right index
finger? I think they have medication for that these days. You might want
to ask your doctor about treatment options.

>> > Are you interested in discussing aviation, by chance?
>>
>> No, not really. Certainly not with you.
>
> Then this conversation serves no further purpose.

Then I shouldn't expect to see any further posts by you.

(Yet, strangely, I find I *do* expect to see some. I wonder why?)
From: Wingnut on
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:09:36 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
> Wingnut wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:05:01 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:
>> > Are you interested in discussing aviation, by chance?
>>
>> No, not really. Certainly not with you.
>
> I HOPE YOU PEOPLE DON'T FLY *REAL* AIRPLANES, CAUSE YOU'RE ALL NUTZZ!!!

Speak for yourself (and Mxsmanic). I'm about as sane as they come.
From: peachyashiepassion on
Wingnut wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:09:36 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Wingnut wrote:
>>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:05:01 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:
>>>> Are you interested in discussing aviation, by chance?
>>> No, not really. Certainly not with you.
>> I HOPE YOU PEOPLE DON'T FLY *REAL* AIRPLANES, CAUSE YOU'RE ALL NUTZZ!!!
>
> Speak for yourself (and Mxsmanic). I'm about as sane as they come.


And you know this because of your extensive background in mental health?
From: Jim Logajan on
Wingnut <wingnut45544(a)hotmail.invalid> wrote:
> I'm about as sane as they come.

The Wingnut sanity clause. Oh my.

Anyway, I'm the standard for sanity. Self-certified from the most
authoritative authority I know.
From: Hatunen on
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 23:04:46 -0500, Jim Logajan
<JamesL(a)Lugoj.com> wrote:

>Wingnut <wingnut45544(a)hotmail.invalid> wrote:
>> I'm about as sane as they come.
>
>The Wingnut sanity clause. Oh my.

There ain't no sanity clause.

(With thanx to Chico.)



--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *