From: Wingnut on 7 Jul 2010 23:45 On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:52:03 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: > Wingnut writes: > >> True, but not relevant to this discussion. Your disagreement had been >> obvious, indeed blindingly so. > > Disagreement is not animosity. It is when one side starts telling the world that the other side is an idiot, or worse. >> Even though I've been reposting it several times a week lately partly >> just to nettle you? > > If I read your posts at all, I generally scan them quickly. Well, there's your mistake then, right there! For each post, you should either read it thoroughly, for comprehension, or else not post a followup to it. >> Neither am I. Hasn't apparently stopped you flooding that newsgroup >> with a lot of posts on the topic, though. > > I just click on the reply button. Indiscriminately, it seems. Perhaps a Tourette's tic in your right index finger? I think they have medication for that these days. You might want to ask your doctor about treatment options. >> > Are you interested in discussing aviation, by chance? >> >> No, not really. Certainly not with you. > > Then this conversation serves no further purpose. Then I shouldn't expect to see any further posts by you. (Yet, strangely, I find I *do* expect to see some. I wonder why?)
From: Wingnut on 7 Jul 2010 23:45 On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:09:36 -0700, The Starmaker wrote: > Wingnut wrote: >> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:05:01 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: >> > Are you interested in discussing aviation, by chance? >> >> No, not really. Certainly not with you. > > I HOPE YOU PEOPLE DON'T FLY *REAL* AIRPLANES, CAUSE YOU'RE ALL NUTZZ!!! Speak for yourself (and Mxsmanic). I'm about as sane as they come.
From: peachyashiepassion on 8 Jul 2010 00:01 Wingnut wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:09:36 -0700, The Starmaker wrote: >> Wingnut wrote: >>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:05:01 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: >>>> Are you interested in discussing aviation, by chance? >>> No, not really. Certainly not with you. >> I HOPE YOU PEOPLE DON'T FLY *REAL* AIRPLANES, CAUSE YOU'RE ALL NUTZZ!!! > > Speak for yourself (and Mxsmanic). I'm about as sane as they come. And you know this because of your extensive background in mental health?
From: Jim Logajan on 8 Jul 2010 00:04 Wingnut <wingnut45544(a)hotmail.invalid> wrote: > I'm about as sane as they come. The Wingnut sanity clause. Oh my. Anyway, I'm the standard for sanity. Self-certified from the most authoritative authority I know.
From: Hatunen on 8 Jul 2010 01:08
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 23:04:46 -0500, Jim Logajan <JamesL(a)Lugoj.com> wrote: >Wingnut <wingnut45544(a)hotmail.invalid> wrote: >> I'm about as sane as they come. > >The Wingnut sanity clause. Oh my. There ain't no sanity clause. (With thanx to Chico.) -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |