Draconian vacation policies for US slave workers
in [Europe]
|
From: Mxsmanic on 1 Aug 2006 01:04 Keith W writes: > Dammed right they do, failure to do so leaves them open > to a malpractise suit. No, it does not. The whole purpose of the lawyer is to interpret the law for her client and make appropriate recommendations; if the client could do that by just reading a list of citations, he wouldn't need a lawyer. Lawyers submit jurisprudence for the purpose of persuading other lawyers (such as judges). That is the last thing they would normally do for most clients, and if that's all they did, then they would certainly be falling short of their duty to clients. > Those that do lose their cases and clients Unfortunately, no. Jury trials are usually decided by factors other than citations of existing jurisprudence. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 1 Aug 2006 01:07 Keith W writes: > If you assume such a growth rate is sustainable. That seems unlikely. Famous last words. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 1 Aug 2006 01:08 Keith W writes: > Since Chinese growth depends > critically on energy availability I seriously doubt it can be sustained at > current levels let alone increased. They can take energy from other countries. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 1 Aug 2006 01:09 Tchiowa writes: > That would be the National Socialist government that ran Germany at the > time. Perhaps you've heard of them? They were no more socialist than the USSR was communist. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Tchiowa on 1 Aug 2006 02:13
Mxsmanic wrote: > Tchiowa writes: > > > That would be the National Socialist government that ran Germany at the > > time. Perhaps you've heard of them? > > They were no more socialist than the USSR was communist. Well, since the USSR was definitely Communist......... The Nazis nationalized many businesses. Socialist by definition. |