Draconian vacation policies for US slave workers
in [Europe]
|
From: Mxsmanic on 2 Aug 2006 04:27 Martin writes: > Something you do not belong to. That is a circular argument. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Jordi on 2 Aug 2006 04:27 Tchiowa wrote: > > > > http://www.bls.gov/news.release/nlsoy.t02.htm > > > > 70,1% of Americans aged 33-38 have been on their job for less than 5 > > years, among them, 54,0% have been less than 2 years, and 38,7% less > > than 1 year. > > > > Of course, those % increase with younger ages. > > Which was my point and you denied it. You have a problem not only with interpreting statistics but also with reading comprehension. I'll put that again for the last time: BLS statistics show that most Americans don't stay in their jobs enough to get a 4-week vacation even at mature ages so your earlier statements about 'most people' are wrong. You denied people changed jobs without an unemployment spell, which has also been proved wrong by official statistics. This is consistent with the rest of your assertions, all based upon 'personal experience' and 50 years behind the times. J.
From: Mxsmanic on 2 Aug 2006 04:27 JohnT writes: > A Registered Charity, which does Humanitarian work? I asked about the doctors, not the organization. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 2 Aug 2006 04:28 JohnT writes: > The part where you claim or infer professional expertise. What is "professional expertise"? And how do you know what I infer? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 2 Aug 2006 04:30
Keith W writes: > Case law is used for that Occasionally, but not usually. > Incorrect. I have had many professional dealings with lawyers > over the years and when giving advice on any but the most > simplistic cases they will advise their client to return after > they have had the opportunity to review current case law. > In many cases they will go for an opinion to a more > senior lawyer who specialises in the field concerned. Do they give you the citations when they meet with you? > You claimed they work from memory, this is not the same > as advising clients about case law. I don't recall saying anything about advising them on case law, which is something clients don't generally care about, anyway. > I didnt claim they did, however they DO refer to it extensively > before rendering opinions to clients. So now it's _before_, and not _during_? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |