From: Mxsmanic on
The Reid writes:

> which clearly does not include fakes, numbnuts.

What defines a "fake" credential?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on
Le 07/08/2006, Mxsmanic a crit :
> The Reid writes:
>
>> which clearly does not include fakes, numbnuts.
>
> What defines a "fake" credential?

A credential you can _buy_ on the Internet is undoubtedly a
Fisher-Price one.

--
remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre
substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me


From: David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate on
<jeremyrh.geo(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:23:21 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
> > wrote:
[]
> > > they
> > >just accumulate a bigger stack of largely meaningless credentials.
> >
> > LOL and that coming from an American.
> >
> > If it is so easy in Europe and if qualifications are required to get a
> > meaningful job, why not acquire some yourself?
>
> Mixi is just sore that he is unable to practice gynaecology despite
> having read several books on the subject.

I thought he was sore after trying to practise some of the exercises on
himself as an experiment.

--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
From: Hatunen on
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:23:16 +0100, "Keith W"
<keithspam(a)kwillshaw.nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>
>"Hatunen" <hatunen(a)cox.net> wrote in message
>news:21ddd2h1i3aoampcrahikv34uthdhie0k4(a)4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:52:33 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
>> <keithnospam(a)kwillshaw.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>
>
>>>There are no price controls as there is no price. Treatment
>>>is free at the point of use.
>>
>> But there are wage controls: the amount a physician receives for
>> providing the service is a form of wage control.
>
>That is the same for any employee of an HMO or hospital.

Employees of an HMO or hospital in America are free to deek
employment elsewhere; there is no quasi-govenmental limit on
their pay. There are "wage" controls in America for physicians
accepting Medicare, though, as well as mandated maximums for
various services rendered.


************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Hatunen on
On 7 Aug 2006 02:28:48 -0700, "Tchiowa" <tchiowa2(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Jordi wrote:
>> Tchiowa wrote:
>> "not excessive" while 240 days *is* "excessive"?
>> > > > Exactly where is the line drawn? Is 236 days "excessive"? 232.45168
>> > > > days?
>> > >
>> > > So then why 7 days holiday is a 'right' and 21 days paid holiday is
>> > > 'something you have to earn'. Where's the line?
>> >
>> > When did I say that 7 days holiday is a "right". You get what you earn.
>>
>> And at start you get 1 week, how did you earn it?
>
>Part of your first year's salary. And for the first year most employers
>don't allow it until the completion of a full 12 month's work.

It's not seven days holiday; it's five days holiday, usually
taken as the five working days of a week so that the actual
holiday, including weekends is nine days.


************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *