From: Hatunen on 18 Aug 2006 13:01 On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:59:04 +0000 (UTC), BB <bbauerMuNgE(a)freeshell.org> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:08:28 -0700, Hatunen wrote: > >> Be sure to be ready on the one day a year when the drizzle and >> clouds have lifted enough to actually see them. > >That's our favorite misconception, which we do our best to keep alive. :-) As a former resident of the state of Washington, but of the part which - despite the state's license plates - is rarely green, I fully understand. ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: mrtravel on 18 Aug 2006 13:29 Hatunen wrote: > The question is, is a passport required to do the traveling? In > the case of the 200 year old Randall document, I suspect not. The > Randall document isnot a passport in the modern sense of that > word. I also note that the document is issued by the US consul at > Malta requesting the courtesy of the island for Mr Randall, who > seems to have already arrived there. > Do a bit of research on passports and then get back to us. Passports are NOT something newly created in the 20th century.
From: Hatunen on 18 Aug 2006 14:34 On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:29:14 GMT, mrtravel <mrtravel(a)bcglobal.net> wrote: >Hatunen wrote: > >> The question is, is a passport required to do the traveling? In >> the case of the 200 year old Randall document, I suspect not. The >> Randall document isnot a passport in the modern sense of that >> word. I also note that the document is issued by the US consul at >> Malta requesting the courtesy of the island for Mr Randall, who >> seems to have already arrived there. >> > >Do a bit of research on passports and then get back to us. >Passports are NOT something newly created in the 20th century. In my original post I admit I misspoke: I meant not that passports came into being after WW1 but that the requirement for passports in Europe came into being after WW1. And prior to WW1 "passport" meant a document a bit different from what it does today. ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Dave Frightens Me on 18 Aug 2006 15:57 On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:35:54 +0100, The Reid <dontuse(a)fell-walker.co.uk> wrote: >Following up to Hatunen > >>>Ah, back to the "if you're educated and successful you're not part of >>>the culture". >> >>You ar e a twit, aren't you. That's not what I said. There are >>many educated people in Kansas and Iowa. > >why are you all bothering? The mans clearly either a troll or a >total idiot. He's told that mostly only educated people speak >English as a second language, He then accuses you of saying >educated people are not part of the culture. He does this sort of >thing all the time. You can not make progress arguing with >someone who does not apply logic and honesty. I'll plonk him if you guys do! -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- --
From: Hatunen on 18 Aug 2006 16:26
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:57:12 +0200, Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors(a)eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: >On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:35:54 +0100, The Reid ><dontuse(a)fell-walker.co.uk> wrote: > >>Following up to Hatunen >> >>>>Ah, back to the "if you're educated and successful you're not part of >>>>the culture". >>> >>>You ar e a twit, aren't you. That's not what I said. There are >>>many educated people in Kansas and Iowa. >> >>why are you all bothering? The mans clearly either a troll or a >>total idiot. He's told that mostly only educated people speak >>English as a second language, He then accuses you of saying >>educated people are not part of the culture. He does this sort of >>thing all the time. You can not make progress arguing with >>someone who does not apply logic and honesty. > >I'll plonk him if you guys do! Done yesterday. ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |