From: Dave Frightens Me on 22 Jul 2006 04:06 On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:49:50 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Dave Frightens Me writes: > >> Your logic is broken. No-one said anything about heating. > >You say that education can compensate for excessive heat. Logically, >then, education can also compensate for excessive cold. Thus, there's >no more need for heating systems than there is for air conditioning >systems. As cold does not mean hot, your logic is broken. Believe it or not, they are two very different things. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- --
From: The Reid on 22 Jul 2006 05:12 Following up to Dave Frightens Me >As cold does not mean hot, your logic is broken. > >Believe it or not, they are two very different things. he will say they are not, being differing levels of electron agitation or some such bollox. -- Mike Reid Walk-eat-photos UK "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site Walk-eat-photos Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
From: David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate on 22 Jul 2006 05:49 Martin <me(a)privacy.net> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:50:36 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Dave Frightens Me writes: > > > >> Hmmm... what do you mean by that? > > > >People have been saying that there's only 30 years of oil left for a > >very long time, and yet the exhaustion of oil reserves seems to remain > >perpetually 30 years in the future. > > That's twice I have agreed with you in one day. A broken clock is correct twice a day! :) -- David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
From: Mxsmanic on 22 Jul 2006 06:14 Dave Frightens Me writes: > Believe it or not, they are two very different things. They are both extremes of temperature, and their physiological effects cannot be eliminated by mere education. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 22 Jul 2006 06:15
The Reid writes: > there were a number of new fields discovered in my lifetime, > there is also the issue of using shale oil at much higher prices. > Are the worlds resources finite? > Is the worlds ability to absorb pollution finite? I think the real limiting factor on the use of fossil fuels is the pollution produced by burning them, not the actual amount available in the ground. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |