Draconian vacation policies for US slave workers
in [Europe]
|
From: Dave Frightens Me on 25 Jul 2006 04:49 On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:45:27 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >mrtravel writes: > >> If you put a fan in the window, you can then have air move in or out, >> depending on a combination of blade direction and shape. > >In hot weather, it doesn't matter, since the air is hot both inside >and out. This is why conversing with you goes nowhere. Remember this was about humidity? Remember that next time you become tired of repeating yourself. BTW, that was not a personal attack, so you allowed to reply. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- --
From: Dave Frightens Me on 25 Jul 2006 04:51 On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:41:17 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Dave Frightens Me writes: > >> There is no situation where leaving the room may not be an option when >> faced with death. > >If death awaits outside, what's the point? That is an IF. Certain death doesn't often lurk outside of every room. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- --
From: Dave Frightens Me on 25 Jul 2006 04:56 On 24 Jul 2006 15:24:45 -0700, "Al Czervik" <caddyshack_al(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > >Dave Frightens Me wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:49:50 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >Dave Frightens Me writes: >> > >> >> Your logic is broken. No-one said anything about heating. >> > >> >You say that education can compensate for excessive heat. Logically, >> >then, education can also compensate for excessive cold. Thus, there's >> >no more need for heating systems than there is for air conditioning >> >systems. >> >> As cold does not mean hot, your logic is broken. >> >> Believe it or not, they are two very different things. > >No they aren't - ask a physics teacher. What physics teacher would say that cold means hot and vice versa? Hint: read what I wrote. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- --
From: Tchiowa on 25 Jul 2006 05:38 The Reid wrote: > Following up to Tchiowa > > > Many scientists think they are. > > Good, so even you cannot totally shut out reality. Apparently you can. Or at least you try. > >But none, I repeat *NONE*, argue that global warming has not been going > >on for over 10,000 years. > > so what? So what??? When I said "Weren't you aware that global warming has been going on for over 10,000 years?" you responded "do you ever wonder why the worlds scientists think otherwise?" I simply demonstrated that your statement was ridiculous. The world's scientists *don't* think otherwise. Then I told you what the consensus actually is. > Are you so locked into arguing blacks white that you > want "man made" added to every mention of warming or you will > start stamping your feet? Are you or aren't you aware that there is a difference?
From: Tchiowa on 25 Jul 2006 05:39
The Reid wrote: > Following up to Tchiowa > > > Many scientists think they are. > > Good, so even you cannot totally shut out reality. Apparently you can. Or at least you try. > >But none, I repeat *NONE*, argue that global warming has not been going > >on for over 10,000 years. > > so what? So what??? When I said "Weren't you aware that global warming has been going on for over 10,000 years?" you responded "do you ever wonder why the worlds scientists think otherwise?" I simply demonstrated that your statement was ridiculous. The world's scientists *don't* think otherwise. Then I told you what the consensus actually is. > Are you so locked into arguing blacks white that you > want "man made" added to every mention of warming or you will > start stamping your feet? Are you or aren't you aware that there is a difference? |