From: Tchiowa on

Dave Frightens Me wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2006 15:24:45 -0700, "Al Czervik"
> <caddyshack_al(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Dave Frightens Me wrote:
> >> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:49:50 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Dave Frightens Me writes:
> >> >
> >> >> Your logic is broken. No-one said anything about heating.
> >> >
> >> >You say that education can compensate for excessive heat. Logically,
> >> >then, education can also compensate for excessive cold. Thus, there's
> >> >no more need for heating systems than there is for air conditioning
> >> >systems.
> >>
> >> As cold does not mean hot, your logic is broken.
> >>
> >> Believe it or not, they are two very different things.
> >
> >No they aren't - ask a physics teacher.
>
> What physics teacher would say that cold means hot and vice versa?

Every physics teacher would. Learn what heat means. Hot and cold are
relative terms, not absolute, that pertain to the amount of heat a body
has.

From: The Reid on
Following up to Tchiowa

>> What physics teacher would say that cold means hot and vice versa?
>
>Every physics teacher would. Learn what heat means. Hot and cold are
>relative terms, not absolute, that pertain to the amount of heat a body
>has.

only if a pedant. Believe it or not words often have different
everyday and scientific meanings. Even physicist understand what
is meant be "hot" and "cold" in everyday usage
--
Mike Reid
Walk-eat-photos UK "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Walk-eat-photos Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
From: The Reid on
Following up to The Reid

>only if a pedant. Believe it or not words often have different
>everyday and scientific meanings. Even physicist understand what
>is meant be "hot" and "cold" in everyday usage

1000 posts now, not bad, can we do 2000?
--
Mike Reid
Walk-eat-photos UK "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Walk-eat-photos Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
From: Dave Frightens Me on
On 25 Jul 2006 02:41:34 -0700, "Tchiowa" <tchiowa2(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>Dave Frightens Me wrote:
>> On 24 Jul 2006 15:24:45 -0700, "Al Czervik"
>> <caddyshack_al(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Dave Frightens Me wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:49:50 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Dave Frightens Me writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Your logic is broken. No-one said anything about heating.
>> >> >
>> >> >You say that education can compensate for excessive heat. Logically,
>> >> >then, education can also compensate for excessive cold. Thus, there's
>> >> >no more need for heating systems than there is for air conditioning
>> >> >systems.
>> >>
>> >> As cold does not mean hot, your logic is broken.
>> >>
>> >> Believe it or not, they are two very different things.
>> >
>> >No they aren't - ask a physics teacher.
>>
>> What physics teacher would say that cold means hot and vice versa?
>
>Every physics teacher would. Learn what heat means.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hot
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cold

Gosh, they are different. Who woulda thunk it?
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
From: The Reid on
Following up to Dave Frightens Me

>>Every physics teacher would. Learn what heat means.
>
>http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hot
>http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cold
>
>Gosh, they are different. Who woulda thunk it?

I think they didnt spot the difference between "hot" and "cold"
and "heat", or are they just arsing about?
--
Mike Reid
Walk-eat-photos UK "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Walk-eat-photos Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap