From: James Silverton on
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:hjsr1k0uv9(a)news5.newsguy.com
> Earl Evleth wrote:
>> On 28/01/10 18:23, in article
>> coudnTiz16BlWvzWnZ2dnUVZ8oednZ2d(a)giganews.com, "John Rennie"
>> <john-rennie(a)talktalk.net> wrote:
>>> Yes he's dumb and the above comment proves it. But he is far
>>> away from being the dumbest on this group. Peejay and jiggy are
>>> dumber, much dumber, and even you at times can give him a contest.
>>
>>
>> None of you guys mastered quantum mechanics, whereas ----.
>
> You remind me of a friend in Hollywood (I.Q. aprox. 165) who once
> proposed to deal with temporary financial difficulties by allowing the
> electric company to carry out its threat to shut down service. (Only
> for the summer months "because it stays light fairly late, so we can
> just go to bed early".) She was a bit startled when I pointed out
> that she would not be able to use her electric typewriter, either.
> (She worked at home, typing scripts for free-lance screen-writers!)

Re that IQ, it sounds like reading Stephen Jay Gould's "The
Mismeasurement of Man" woukld not come amiss.

--
Jim Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

From: tim.... on

"Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"
<tribuyltinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4B617CEE.4753424(a)yahoo.co.uk...
>
>
> "tim...." wrote:
>>
>> "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"
>> <tribuyltinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:4B615319.B7603F52(a)yahoo.co.uk...
>> >
>> >
>> > "tim...." wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"
>> >> <tribuyltinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> >> news:4B604C46.808AB2A7(a)yahoo.co.uk...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> The situation is different where the individual's job is to
>> >> >> "dispense"
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> food as they could have some influence on deciding what is to be
>> >> >> thrown
>> >> >> away.
>> >> >>
>> >> > If they want to fire someone for eating food,
>> >>
>> >> The charge is theft.
>> >>
>> > The problem is that if someone is going to be thrown away, then the
>> > owner has abandoned it and *by definition* taking it cannot
>> > logically be "theft".
>>
>> The "owner" is the company and they have made no such decision.
>>
> But the problem is that under the common law, abandoning something
> should make it available to all. If you throw a five dollar bill to
> the curb, and someone else picks it up, you shouldn't be able to
> sue that he stole your money.

But you can (at least where I live)!

tim


From: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) on


"tim...." wrote:
>
> "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"
> <tribuyltinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:4B617CEE.4753424(a)yahoo.co.uk...
> >
> >
> > "tim...." wrote:
> >>
> >> "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"
> >> <tribuyltinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> >> news:4B615319.B7603F52(a)yahoo.co.uk...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "tim...." wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"
> >> >> <tribuyltinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> >> >> news:4B604C46.808AB2A7(a)yahoo.co.uk...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The situation is different where the individual's job is to
> >> >> >> "dispense"
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> food as they could have some influence on deciding what is to be
> >> >> >> thrown
> >> >> >> away.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > If they want to fire someone for eating food,
> >> >>
> >> >> The charge is theft.
> >> >>
> >> > The problem is that if someone is going to be thrown away, then the
> >> > owner has abandoned it and *by definition* taking it cannot
> >> > logically be "theft".
> >>
> >> The "owner" is the company and they have made no such decision.
> >>
> > But the problem is that under the common law, abandoning something
> > should make it available to all. If you throw a five dollar bill to
> > the curb, and someone else picks it up, you shouldn't be able to
> > sue that he stole your money.
>
> But you can (at least where I live)!
>
Presumably you can sue someone for anything, but I mean win.



--
"Gonna take a sedimental journey", what Old Man River actually
said.
From: Earl Evleth on
On 28/01/10 21:11, in article hjsr1k0uv9(a)news5.newsguy.com,
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

> She was a bit startled when I pointed out that
> she would not be able to use her electric typewriter, either. (She
> worked at home, typing scripts for free-lance screen-writers!)


Reminds me, we still have ours. An IBM selectric, which had a correcting
tape, a big thing at the time. It is down stairs in the cave.

We had it with a French key board since generally the French keyboard is a
bit more universal than the American. The only problem is that several of
the letters are in different location, but when typing I can switch over
from the English to the French sequence in a minute or so. I only type using
the French sequence. Occasionally the Mac switches over without my noticing
until I hit the "m" or "a", or whatever.


From: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) on


Earl Evleth wrote:
>
> On 28/01/10 21:11, in article hjsr1k0uv9(a)news5.newsguy.com,
> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > She was a bit startled when I pointed out that
> > she would not be able to use her electric typewriter, either. (She
> > worked at home, typing scripts for free-lance screen-writers!)
>
> Reminds me, we still have ours. An IBM selectric, which had a correcting
> tape, a big thing at the time. It is down stairs in the cave.
>
I can see Earl under the Paris Opera House, floating about like
Gollum on a lake, flitting from gloomy room to gloomy room, a
stealthy apparition, a midnight shadow, a bat, one of the
Nibelungen, a bit like this, a bit like that.



--
"Gonna take a sedimental journey", what Old Man River actually
said.