Prev: Gave up seat and got all this!!!!
Next: Easy Jet
From: Buddenbrooks on 14 Jan 2010 11:48 I have just received a checklist from Easyjet for my soon flight. It gives smaller dimensions than the web site. Can anyone confirm that they have travelled with 'one standard piece of hand baggage to maximum dimensions of 56x45x25cm' rather than the smaller size in the checklist, 'not exceeding the maximum dimensions of 55 x 40 x 20cm. ' Please don't just refer to the Easyjet web site since it is Easy Jet documentation that is inconsistent.
From: Roland Perry on 14 Jan 2010 11:58 In message <HVH3n.704$At4.185(a)newsfe04.ams2>, at 16:48:42 on Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Buddenbrooks <knightstemplar(a)budweiser.com> remarked: >I have just received a checklist from Easyjet for my soon flight. It >gives smaller dimensions than the web site. > >Can anyone confirm that they have travelled with 'one standard piece of >hand baggage to maximum dimensions of 56x45x25cm' >rather than the smaller size in the checklist, 'not exceeding the >maximum dimensions of 55 x 40 x 20cm. ' What you really need is someone to measure one of those wire frames they have. That's the only criteria they use in practice. -- Roland Perry
From: Buddenbrooks on 14 Jan 2010 12:32 "Roland Perry" <roland(a)perry.co.uk> wrote in message news:S2C00lhv00TLFA$M(a)perry.co.uk... > In message <HVH3n.704$At4.185(a)newsfe04.ams2>, at 16:48:42 on Thu, 14 Jan > > What you really need is someone to measure one of those wire frames they > have. That's the only criteria they use in practice. > -- Unfortunately not enough time and in any case these vary. A colleague recently with a different airline got charged extra going out because his bag jammed solidly going out and slipped in easy coming back. He did get his money back.
From: Neil Williams on 14 Jan 2010 12:55 On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:48:42 -0000, "Buddenbrooks" <knightstemplar(a)budweiser.com> wrote: >Can anyone confirm that they have travelled with 'one standard piece of hand >baggage to maximum dimensions of 56x45x25cm' >rather than the smaller size in the checklist, 'not exceeding the maximum >dimensions of 55 x 40 x 20cm. ' They have changed to the IATA size (they call it that) of 56x45x25 and have replaced all the cages for that purpose, though I haven't measured them and my usual hand luggage bag isn't that big. I would say the checklist was wrong. I think one reason for the change (other than to make them more competitive as a business airline) is that the overhead bins in the Airbuses appear noticeably larger than the Boeings and can fit the larger size more easily. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply.
From: Roland Perry on 15 Jan 2010 16:45
In message <HVH3n.704$At4.185(a)newsfe04.ams2>, at 16:48:42 on Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Buddenbrooks <knightstemplar(a)budweiser.com> remarked: >I have just received a checklist from Easyjet for my soon flight. It >gives smaller dimensions than the web site. > >Can anyone confirm that they have travelled with 'one standard piece of >hand baggage to maximum dimensions of 56x45x25cm' >rather than the smaller size in the checklist, 'not exceeding the >maximum dimensions of 55 x 40 x 20cm. ' I've just booked an Easyjet flight for February, and the Boarding Pass says: "Hand Baggage Policy Each passenger is allowed one piece of hand baggage only, including any hand bags and laptop cases. All hand baggage must be within the maximum dimensions of 56 x 45 x 25cm." ps. They wanted �8 credit card fee for a one-leg trip!! -- Roland Perry |