From: MatteasKern on
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:51:05 GMT, "Maxx" <sky.dancer(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>"gel" <civilization(a)shaw.ca> wrote in message
>news:1153017427_30983(a)sp6iad.superfeed.net...

>> Ah! what's the point.
>The Points.
>1. State the facts without blowing them out of proportion;

The media have been reporting so many different stories about Edmonton Police
brutality - all of which are readable on the newspaper sites.

In fact the Edmonton Journal devoted yet another page to the police brutality
on Sunday 3 June 2007, complete with more horrific pictures!!

>2. Post a reasonable subject line.

Based on all the stories, the headers are correct.

>3. Posts credible back up links.

Why should links be posted. If you know how to use a browser, the stories are
easily readable.

>4. Post only to related groups.
>5. Don't flood the groups with multiple threads.

Thanks for all the interest you have stimulated in knowing about the crooked
Edmonton cops!

>> The cops beat up the weak. That is what i make of your protection of
>> the Edmonton cops that beated that man to death.

>I read that he swollowed his stash of cocaine. I haven't read otherwise.

>> My training as a federal officer would have make me handle that guy
>> with
>> no harm .I have extremely good training to handcuff fast and the first
>> action of me or any Feds on scene would have been to immediately call an
>> ambulance on a code of emergency.

>The aritcles I read did not say if this was done or not.

>> Even when we arrest we are train to save life.Especially in a minor
>> case of car theft.
>> Maxx are you Edmonton police officer.If so please their is no use to
>> protect the bad apples or the bad actions of officers.
>
>I'm not protecting anyone. I don't protect, or accuse without the facts.
>Do you see what has been done here? We just turned this into a dicussion.
>