French censored answer to Google Earth.
in [Europe]
|
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on 27 Jul 2006 16:50 Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: > > > And what about the other points ? > > Restricted access to the government is sufficient in itself to block a > career. Is that your answer to the other points ? How does restridcted access to the government (which is not the total closure you are picturing) impair the career of an arts journalist ? -- remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on 27 Jul 2006 16:50 <barney2(a)cix.compulink.co.uk> wrote: > In article <03ofc25vn7rsl1870hm6q3gd9cd79gt9gi(a)4ax.com>, > mxsmanic(a)gmail.com (Mxsmanic) wrote: > > > *From:* Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> > > *Date:* Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:36:45 +0200 > > > > David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and > > deansgate writes: > > > > > Which countries allow their media to publish anything? > > > > None, but some allow more than others. > > So in what ways are the French media less free than the media in other > developed countries? When privacy matters, they certainly are. There are also the Gayssot law (denying the existence of the Shoah is an offence in France). The Gayssot law is a restriction of free speech, but I think it's quite an healthy one. -- remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me
From: David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate on 27 Jul 2006 17:36 Martin <me(a)privacy.net> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:41:54 -0500, barney2(a)cix.compulink.co.uk wrote: > > >In article <gcqhc2do2rd2u2umtb7avc7alo0gptl4m9(a)4ax.com>, me(a)privacy.net > >(Martin) wrote: > > > >> *From:* Martin <me(a)privacy.net> > >> *Date:* Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:29:25 +0200 > >> > >> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:30:54 -0500, barney2(a)cix.compulink.co.uk wrote: > >> > >> >In article <scghc2tv0t576441prm4itnohss4l4lb2c(a)4ax.com>, > >> me(a)privacy.net >(Martin) wrote: > >> > > >> >> *From:* Martin <me(a)privacy.net> > >> >> *Date:* Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:37:49 +0200 > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:27:32 -0500, barney2(a)cix.compulink.co.uk > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >In article <4aehc21350vrkgsg50ru5eagfjvlvl10jr(a)4ax.com>, > >> >> me(a)privacy.net >(Martin) wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> *From:* Martin <me(a)privacy.net> > >> >> >> *Date:* Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:04:11 +0200 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:39:24 +0200, Stanislas de Kertanguy > >> >> >> <stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Martin a expos le 27/07/2006 : > >> >> >> >>>> Do you read Le Canard Enchan ? > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Rarely, since it's not online. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> No of course it isn't > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> http://www.lecanardenchaine.fr/une4474.html > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >You don't get more than the first page on their website, though. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> How many copies would they sell if it was all there? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Which commercial newspaper puts all it's content on the web? > >> >> > > >> >> >Many - in fact most - put far, far more than a page. > >> >> > >> >> Many? Give 15 examples. > >> > > >> >UK: Guardian, Independent, Times, Telegraph, Eastern Daily Press > >> > > >> >France: Liberation, Le Monde, Figaro, Voix du Nord, International > >> Herald >Tribune > >> > > >> >USA: Washington Post, New York Times, Houston Chronicle, LA Times, > >> >Philadelphia Inquirer > >> > > >> >I would be interested to see 15 examples of major newspapers which > >> /only/ >have a single page of content online! > >> > >> I asked "Which commercial newspaper puts all it's content on the web?" > > > >Read the thread! To that point, I commented: > > > >"Many - in fact most - put far, far more than a page." > > > >And you asked for examples, so I gave you 15 examples of newspapers which > >put far, far more than a single page online. The point being that these > >are newspapers which have decided having /lots/ of content online is worth > > the potential loss of hard-copy sales. This is far more significant IMHO > >than whether any given newspaper technically has /every last word/ of its > >content online. > > Yeah but like Mixi you answered a different question. > FFS everybody knows you can read parts of newspapers on the web free. At least the examples Barney gave for the UK constitute more than what I'd call "part." It probably accounts for most of the parts that most people actually read. -- David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on 27 Jul 2006 17:37 Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Most operating systems don't have antivirus > software, however. There is antivirus software available for M -- remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on 27 Jul 2006 17:37
Martin <me(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >I'm pretty sure he would refuse it, for what le Canard writes is peddled > >with puns, humor, and drawings ; which are obviously impairing the good > >communication between the journalist and the reader if the latter does > >not share the same cultural knowledge with the former ! > > You are right. Give him an old franc. You mean a pre-1959 franc ? I've never seen one ! -- remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me |