French censored answer to Google Earth.
in [Europe]
|
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on 27 Jul 2006 17:37 Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: > > > Is that true for all antivirus software and all operating systems ? > > Generally speaking, yes. So there are some (antivirus, operating system) couples that are stable? > Most operating systems don't have antivirus > software, however. Well, apart from Windows, there is antivirus software for GNU/Linux, for some various flavours of Unix (including Mac OS X). One may add the previous MacOS. I don't think there is some for OS/2, which use is really folklore these days. Which operating systems without antivirus did you have in mind ? -- remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me
From: JohnT on 27 Jul 2006 17:39 "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4h7ic2t8u0vbu9c69fpu0me240o0g6fdl1(a)4ax.com... > Richard writes: > >> If anyone who wanted to gain access to a demonstration needed a press >> card, >> then it wouldn't be very public. > > Sometimes that is the objective. Is it possible that you are a latter-day Henry Root? JohnT
From: Go Fig on 27 Jul 2006 19:28 In article <1hj5o7y.18rb6u211bmu80N%stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net>, Stanislas de Kertanguy <stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net> wrote: > Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: > > > > > And what about the other points ? > > > > Restricted access to the government is sufficient in itself to block a > > career. > > > Is that your answer to the other points ? Last time, is it appropriate for the government to issue required press credentials ?? jay Thu Jul 27, 2006 mailto:gofig(a)mac.com > > How does restridcted access to the government (which is not the total > closure you are picturing) impair the career of an arts journalist ?
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on 27 Jul 2006 20:17 Le 28/07/2006, Go Fig a crit : > In article <1hj5o7y.18rb6u211bmu80N%stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net>, > Stanislas de Kertanguy <stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net> wrote: > >> Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: >>> >>>> And what about the other points ? >>> >>> Restricted access to the government is sufficient in itself to block a >>> career. >> >> >> Is that your answer to the other points ? > > Last time, is it appropriate for the government to issue required press > credentials ?? I beg your pardon? Last time what ? Who the hell do you think you are ? My answer will be : 1/ the CCJFP is _not_ the government. Look up its website. 2/ Government agents can _not_ hold a press card. 3/ The conditions required to hold a press card are open to discussion, but as a principle, I don't find this insitution inappropriate - it is much akin to a US syndicate? -- remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on 27 Jul 2006 20:19
Le 28/07/2006, Stanislas de Kertanguy a crit : > it is much akin > to a US syndicate? My mistake - I had totally misundrstood what a syndicate is. Nevertheless, the rest of my answer still holds. -- remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me |