French censored answer to Google Earth.
in [Europe]
|
From: Go Fig on 27 Jul 2006 21:53 In article <mn.e0897d672d8216dd.57822(a)lesptt.net>, Stanislas de Kertanguy <stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net> wrote: > Le 28/07/2006, Go Fig a crit : > > In article <1hj5o7y.18rb6u211bmu80N%stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net>, > > Stanislas de Kertanguy <stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net> wrote: > > > >> Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: > >>> > >>>> And what about the other points ? > >>> > >>> Restricted access to the government is sufficient in itself to block a > >>> career. > >> > >> > >> Is that your answer to the other points ? > > > > Last time, is it appropriate for the government to issue required press > > credentials ?? > > I beg your pardon? Last time what ? That I ask this very DIRECT question. > Who the hell do you think you are ? > > My answer will be : > > 1/ the CCJFP is _not_ the government. Look up its website. This LAW goes back to 1935! > > 2/ Government agents can _not_ hold a press card. > > 3/ The conditions required to hold a press card are open to discussion, > but as a principle, I don't find this insitution inappropriate - it is > much akin to a US syndicate? No. jay Thu Jul 27, 2006 mailto:gofig(a)mac.com
From: Mxsmanic on 28 Jul 2006 01:08 Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: > There is antivirus software available for M What is 'M'? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 28 Jul 2006 01:09 Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: > So there are some (antivirus, operating system) couples that are stable? It is theoretically possible. I have not seen any. > Which operating systems without antivirus did you have in mind ? The vast majority. Windows, Mac, and Linux are exceptions, not the rule. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 28 Jul 2006 01:09 Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: > When privacy matters, they certainly are. There are also the Gayssot law > (denying the existence of the Shoah is an offence in France). The > Gayssot law is a restriction of free speech, but I think it's quite an > healthy one. The Nazis thought that restrictions on free speech were healthy, too. Or is it illegal to point that out? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Carole Allen on 28 Jul 2006 01:07
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:19:47 +0200, Stanislas de Kertanguy <stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net> wrote: He wrote that it had no relation to the cost (or absence thereof). I'm >too lazy to dig up the Message-ID, but he did write it, so I infer that >by "free" he means "freedom of expression". > >-- He again snipped up the OP's message and switched up the intent of the OP's message which was that he could use free (as in no cost, discarded, found on the streets) newspaper to insulate the radiator. Somehow he got into "free press" as in freedom of the press to print whatever. |