From: didier Meurgues on

Stanislas de Kertanguy a écrit :

> Martin <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
> > >I'm pretty sure he would refuse it, for what le Canard writes is peddled
> > >with puns, humor, and drawings ; which are obviously impairing the good
> > >communication between the journalist and the reader if the latter does
> > >not share the same cultural knowledge with the former !
> >
> > You are right. Give him an old franc.
>
> You mean a pre-1959 franc ? I've never seen one !

PFTTT... Me, I've already used, euhh... seen, the one of 1360 :+)

http://www.monnaiedeparis.com/musee/visite.htm# (room 6)
http://www.monnaiedeparis.fr/musee/index.htm
http://www.monnaiedeparis.fr

didier Meurgues

> --
> remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre
> substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me

From: didier Meurgues on
Go Fig a écrit :

> In article <mn.e0897d672d8216dd.57822(a)lesptt.net>, Stanislas de
> Kertanguy <stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net> wrote:
>
> > Le 28/07/2006, Go Fig a ?crit :
> > > In article <1hj5o7y.18rb6u211bmu80N%stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net>,
> > > Stanislas de Kertanguy <stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
> > >>>
> > >>>> And what about the other points ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Restricted access to the government is sufficient in itself to block a
> > >>> career.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Is that your answer to the other points ?
> > >
> > > Last time, is it appropriate for the government to issue required press
> > > credentials ??
> >
> > I beg your pardon? Last time what ?
>
>
> That I ask this very DIRECT question.
>
>
> > Who the hell do you think you are ?
> >
> > My answer will be :
> >
> > 1/ the CCJFP is _not_ the government. Look up its website.
>
>
> This LAW goes back to 1935!

And, not going back to the Ordonnance de Moulins..., some parts of the
law concerning the delimitation of street public domain, to 1605 (the
roman law delimiting maritim domain on the mediterranean sea, probably
still in force in Italy, was even only abrogated in the 70ies).
So what ?

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/WAspad/Visu?cid=926&indice=1&table=LEX_SIMPLE_AV90&ligneDeb=1

didier Meurgues

> >
> > 2/ Government agents can _not_ hold a press card.
> >
> > 3/ The conditions required to hold a press card are open to discussion,
> > but as a principle, I don't find this insitution inappropriate - it is
> > much akin to a US syndicate?
>
> No.
>
> jay
> Thu Jul 27, 2006
> mailto:gofig(a)mac.com

From: didier Meurgues on

Martin a écrit :

> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:37:40 +0200, stanislas.dekertanguy(a)lesptt.net
> (Stanislas de Kertanguy) wrote:
>
> >Martin <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
> >
> >> >I'm pretty sure he would refuse it, for what le Canard writes is peddled
> >> >with puns, humor, and drawings ; which are obviously impairing the good
> >> >communication between the journalist and the reader if the latter does
> >> >not share the same cultural knowledge with the former !
> >>
> >> You are right. Give him an old franc.
> >
> > You mean a pre-1959 franc ? I've never seen one !
>
>
> I have some Vichy French Franc aluminium coins from WWII
> http://www.edixxon.com/coinpc/c_coins/660133France1942.html

Do you have this one ?
http://www.edixxon.com/coinpc/c_coins/660135France1946.html

didier Meurgues

> If you haven't a franc a sous will do.
> If you haven't a sous God bless you!
> --
>
> Martin

From: didier Meurgues on

Martin a écrit :

> On 28 Jul 2006 06:19:16 -0700, "didier Meurgues" <erdnisloed(a)voila.fr>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Stanislas de Kertanguy a écrit :
> >
> >> Martin <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > >I'm pretty sure he would refuse it, for what le Canard writes is peddled
> >> > >with puns, humor, and drawings ; which are obviously impairing the good
> >> > >communication between the journalist and the reader if the latter does
> >> > >not share the same cultural knowledge with the former !
> >> >
> >> > You are right. Give him an old franc.
> >>
> >> You mean a pre-1959 franc ? I've never seen one !
> >
> >PFTTT... Me, I've already used, euhh... seen, the one of 1360 :+)
> >
> >http://www.monnaiedeparis.com/musee/visite.htm# (room 6)
> >http://www.monnaiedeparis.fr/musee/index.htm
> >http://www.monnaiedeparis.fr
>
> Do you mind not flashing your money in front of Mixi, he is allergic
> to money.

Well, I don't have much... yet ! But I'm thinking about the french
coins history central walls (left image below) of the monnaie museum...

Still searching the quai Conti sewage maps on the web...!!! :+)

http://www.monnaiedeparis.com/fonds_doc/pcour.htm

didier Meurgues

> Martin

From: Gregory Morrow on

Mxsmanic wrote:

> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
>
> > When privacy matters, they certainly are. There are also the Gayssot law
> > (denying the existence of the Shoah is an offence in France). The
> > Gayssot law is a restriction of free speech, but I think it's quite an
> > healthy one.
>
> The Nazis thought that restrictions on free speech were healthy, too.
> Or is it illegal to point that out?


Not if it would end this thread...

--
Best
Greg