From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on
Mxsmanic avait nonc :
> Gregory Morrow writes:
>
>> Does this site also display the French penchant for Flash...???
>
> No, thank goodness. Don't give them any ideas.

But you said that the French can't design a website without Flash. It
seems you should reconsider this statement.

--
remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre
substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me


From: Mxsmanic on
Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:

> But you said that the French can't design a website without Flash.

Maybe they hired designers from abroad.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on
Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:

> You know, not every French lives in Paris.

Every French what?

> Goportail was designed to have an equal image quality throughout
> France, to the Louvre pyramid to the smallest villages in the
> Morvan. Of course, when you compare big cities, Google Earth wins by far.

Ah, so Goportail has a secret database of ultra-high-resolution
images, and deliberately blurs them so that every square metre of
France looks like it was last photographed in 1952?

> And the images they use are not satellite ones, and they are true
> color.

So they _were_ photographed in 1952!

And I saw the very crude masking of some seaside facility in Le Havre.
I can't believe people are still doing that. Perhaps France is still
doing aerial photography from biplanes, but the bad guys have
satellites now, and the best satellites now can read your wristwatch
from altitude.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on
Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:

> What is the link between cryptography and the free press ?

Both have been hindered by the military.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Gregory Morrow on

Mxsmanic wrote:

> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
>
> > You know, not every French lives in Paris.
>
> Every French what?
>
> > Géoportail was designed to have an equal image quality throughout
> > France, to the Louvre pyramid to the smallest villages in the
> > Morvan. Of course, when you compare big cities, Google Earth wins by far.
>
> Ah, so Géoportail has a secret database of ultra-high-resolution
> images, and deliberately blurs them so that every square metre of
> France looks like it was last photographed in 1952?
>
> > And the images they use are not satellite ones, and they are true
> > color.
>
> So they _were_ photographed in 1952!
>
> And I saw the very crude masking of some seaside facility in Le Havre.
> I can't believe people are still doing that. Perhaps France is still
> doing aerial photography from biplanes, but the bad guys have
> satellites now, and the best satellites now can read your wristwatch
> from altitude.


Heh. Reminds me of those photography restrictions that used to exist
when flying in commercial passenger craft above East Bloc
countries...yeah, that hazy pic I took on that flight between Prague
and East Berlin SURE was going to mark me as a NATO spy!

--
Best
Greg