From: Dave Frightens Me on
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:27:34 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Dave Frightens Me writes:
>
>> Sport provides a civilised means of competition. This is of enormous
>> value, as the British empire demonstrated.
>
>Sport was of enormous value to the British Empire?

Yes. Read and you will learn.

>There are many forms of competition that seem civilized enough to me.
>Sport is unique in that it is competition that serves no useful
>purpose ... and it isn't always civilized.

The purpose it serves is slighty abstract, so I don't expect you to
understand, but I will give you a chance.

Tensions are much better released on the playing field than at war.
Simple as that really.

>> Then you would have a heap of unemployed soldiers and arms
>> manufacturers, so the point is moot.
>
>That's better than having a heap of dead soldiers.

History says otherwise.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
From: A Human Being on

Tim C. wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:27:34 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >There are many forms of competition that seem civilized enough to me.
> >Sport is unique in that it is competition that serves no useful
> >purpose ... and it isn't always civilized.
>
> It can be seen as a stylised version of warfare.

Which indicates that societies where they are given undue importance
consists of people who are more aggressive by nature.

> In that sense it
> serves a very useful purpose.

In what way does it help the population?

> --
> Tim C.

From: Dave Frightens Me on
On 6 Aug 2006 13:46:21 -0700, "A Human Being"
<justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>Tim C. wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:27:34 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >There are many forms of competition that seem civilized enough to me.
>> >Sport is unique in that it is competition that serves no useful
>> >purpose ... and it isn't always civilized.
>>
>> It can be seen as a stylised version of warfare.
>
>Which indicates that societies where they are given undue importance
>consists of people who are more aggressive by nature.
>
>> In that sense it
>> serves a very useful purpose.
>
>In what way does it help the population?

Odd how your posting style resembles Mixi's...
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
From: Gregory Morrow on

Tim C. wrote:

> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:27:34 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >There are many forms of competition that seem civilized enough to me.
> >Sport is unique in that it is competition that serves no useful
> >purpose ... and it isn't always civilized.
>
> It can be seen as a stylised version of warfare. In that sense it
> serves a very useful purpose.


Anyway you look at it sports is a TOTAL waste of time...people that are
heavily involved in sports are generally fairly stupid. When has an athlete
ever been known to be a great thinker?

--
Best
Greg
..


From: Dave Frightens Me on
On 5 Aug 2006 12:23:23 -0700, "A Human Being"
<justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>JohnT wrote:
>> "A Human Being" <justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1154803838.617106.299440(a)m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Martin wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:56:29 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Dave Frightens Me writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> If it's valuable, why aren't you better off?
>> >> >
>> >> >Why are professional basketball players paid more than teachers and
>> >> >doctors?
>> >>
>> >> Why aren't you better off?
>> >
>> > If you can answer the question he asked you will have the answer to why
>> > he isn't better off.
>> >
>>
>> The answer to his question is that he hasn't any qualifications do do
>> anything which will pay reasonable money.
>
>How did you know he hasn't any qualifications? Have you seen his CV ?
>
>> So he is poor. Yes, providing the
>> answer to the question did give the answer.
>
>An incorrect one .

As you know what his CV looks like, why do you believe he's poor?
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--