French censored answer to Google Earth.
in [Europe]
|
From: barney2 on 8 Aug 2006 21:50 In article <1155079640.640149.12000(a)h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com (A Human Being) wrote: > *From:* "A Human Being" <justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> > *Date:* 8 Aug 2006 16:27:20 -0700 > > > Hatunen wrote: > > On 7 Aug 2006 06:02:33 -0700, "A Human Being" > > <justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >History doesn't draw any conclusions for us. It only tells us about > > the > > >events that happened . Its people who look for a moral in a story. > > > > All history is written from a point of view. > > Not necessarily. Could you give some examples of NPOV historical accounts?
From: Hatunen on 8 Aug 2006 22:56 On 8 Aug 2006 17:29:02 -0700, "A Human Being" <justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >Hatunen wrote: >> On 8 Aug 2006 16:27:20 -0700, "A Human Being" >> <justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >Hatunen wrote: >> >> On 7 Aug 2006 06:02:33 -0700, "A Human Being" >> >> <justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >History doesn't draw any conclusions for us. It only tells us about the >> >> >events that happened . Its people who look for a moral in a story. >> >> >> >> All history is written from a point of view. >> > >> >Not necessarily. >> >> As a human being it is impossible to not have one. You, >> especially, should know that. > >I do, which is why I said not necessarily. If it is impossible to not have one, then it is necessarily. ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Hatunen on 8 Aug 2006 22:57 On 8 Aug 2006 17:54:13 -0700, "A Human Being" <justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >Padraig Breathnach wrote: >> "A Human Being" <justahumanbeing1(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >Hatunen wrote: >> >> >> All history is written from a point of view. >> > >> >Not necessarily. >> > >> Necessarily, even though many historians try to eliminate bias. > >That's your opinion, you are entitled to it. Mine differs. You are, then, claiming that there are perfect human beings without any biases? Amazing. ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Mxsmanic on 9 Aug 2006 00:57 A Human Being writes: > That explains very well the behaviour of the bullies here . The best explanation for bullying here is low intelligence. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate on 9 Aug 2006 02:44
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > A Human Being writes: > > > That explains very well the behaviour of the bullies here . > > The best explanation for bullying here is low intelligence. Yours? -- David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org |