Harry Reid Shopped in Green Valley
in [Las Vegas]
|
From: Borked Psuedo Mailed on 13 Aug 2010 20:16 On 8/13/2010 6:12 PM, tom ronson wrote: > Borked Psuedo Mailed wrote: > >> That explains it. >> Explains why you're such a hateful puke. >> You listen to Glen Beck. > > honestly I'd blame that on Rush. but you might be right. > > Got to blame it on someone. Why not blame it on Bush like the rest of your kind does.
From: octoad on 13 Aug 2010 20:54 "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FbmdnaOor_D_OvjRnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com... > In article <i447f80a3q(a)news4.newsguy.com>, "octoad" <davko58(a)sonic.net> >> Ever heard of financial engineering? The intertwined global economy? >> High >> frequency trading? Dark pools? Etc etc etc? Its is SO complex and >> changes >> SO fast and is SO much more subject to a sneeze in in China or a bank >> collapse in Europe than it ever was before. > Yep and according to the Dems those are all behind us. And there is > no reason to think that they have any longer term impact than robber > barons or any of the other boogey men of days gone by. LOL. The Robber Barons stole massive amounts of money and then built things like railroads, telegraph lines, oil fields, etc. Today's Wall St Thieves steal massive amounts of money and then trade it amongst themselves, back and forth, while producing nothing of value and contributing nothing to society. Where you been man? >> And what happens when you pour money into a DOW index fund for decades, >> watching it rise to 14,000, then in the year you retire it slides to 6500 >> in >> a matter of a couple of weeks? The S&P 500 has made zero returns for the >> last ten years. > You really have to work hard to come up with these never happened > before doomsday scenarios for you to argue with me? Say what? That "never happened before doomsday scenario" above happened at the end of 2008. The S&P scenario above is happening at this very moment. >> You ignore all the "advances" in the way these markets work, and ignore >> the >> inevitable next financial system collapse caused by Wall St "innovations" >> we >> haven't even heard of yet. The amount of trust you place in Wall St >> money >> managers is astounding. > No more so than the amount you put in Congress, especially after > all the talk about how they have gutted the "Trust fund"/ Again, say what? I put almost no trust in any Congress of any party to do the right thing, ever. But Social Security has been providing steady consistent income for everyone who has contributed to it for 80 years DESPITE all the money Congress has borrowed from the fund, and with some modifications it can continue to do so. >> No, actually it has 20 more years, and with a few tweaks like extending >> the >> retirement age (which reflects the reality of people living longer) it >> can >> last another 100. > But if any of the economic scenarios you so breathlessly posit > come together as a reason to not go viral, it won't. The factual 2008 sceanario and the factual current S&P scenario that's happening at this moment haven't shut Social Security down. In fact, if the fund wasn't constantly being borrowed from by Congresses of both parties over the course of decades it would be about the strongest thing in the history of government. O
From: jerry the jerk on 13 Aug 2010 21:37 On Aug 13 2010 4:19 PM, tom ronson wrote: > jerry the jerk wrote: > > > Everyone knows right away you were talking about me moronson. > > why's that? oh -- because you're the only one whose done such an idiotic > thing. > > > The moronson household must be a regular 3 ring circus for petes sake. > > a lot of days it is --- but working households can be like that. > > -- > �We wanted them (the media) to ask the questions we want to answer so > that they report the news the way we want it reported.� -- NV senatorial > candidate, Sharon Angle. > > > --tr Oh how true. My household was also like yours, a longtime ago before my back gave out and I had to retire early. Oh..those were the days! sniff....sniff....excuse me. I get emotional when I thinkj about my old job. ______________________________________________________________________� RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
From: jerry the jerk on 13 Aug 2010 21:39 On Aug 13 2010 4:45 PM, tom ronson wrote: > Cat_in_awe wrote: > > > How is this 'recommending' Second Amendment remedies? It seems to me she's > > saying that exactly what we don't want. And, of course, she's right about > > the meaning, intent and reason for the Second Amendment. > > I don't recall anyone "recommending" anything. > > and okay --- you want things your way, right? gotta ask --- who are you > and why does your opinion matter? hint --- you don't and it doesn't -- > at least any more than anyone else's. (sorry) > > the problem that the Tea Party faces are the candidates they get put up > to run. they're not all that great --- and have a tough time striking > the happy medium needed to win an election, if their core constituents > would let them that is. > > > What part of this is so hard to understand? > > nothing --- but who is going to do it? mostly older white people? why > don't they try it now if things are so dire (I'd ask why now, but I know > that answer)? let me tell you why -- none of them want to be the one > with am M14 or M16 rifle round through their forehead as they put up the > feeble fight. > > it'll take more than hot air to take on the government --- because > politicians, *none of them*, will let you rattle their cages too hard. > > -- > �We wanted them (the media) to ask the questions we want to answer so > that they report the news the way we want it reported.� -- NV senatorial > candidate, Sharon Angle. > > > --tr wow! tough talk there from a stupid liberal and obama asskisser. that tommy moronson really can come up with powerful statements that mean absolutely.....NOTHING. ______________________________________________________________________� : the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
From: jerry the jerk on 13 Aug 2010 21:44
On Aug 13 2010 5:16 PM, Borked Psuedo Mailed wrote: > On 8/13/2010 6:12 PM, tom ronson wrote: > > Borked Psuedo Mailed wrote: > > > >> That explains it. > >> Explains why you're such a hateful puke. > >> You listen to Glen Beck. > > > > honestly I'd blame that on Rush. but you might be right. > > > > > > Got to blame it on someone. > Why not blame it on Bush like the rest of your kind does. He's right you know tommy. Maxine waters blames bush for her violations of the ethic rules. ain't that funny? what a dumb stupid liberal to say that and even dumber will be the other libs who believe it. -----� RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com |