From: tim.... on

"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kurtullman-F4E3FA.07494213122009(a)70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net...
> In article <7ojr7cF3pkartU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> "tim...." <tims_new_home(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> As I've already said, what is available in the passport is insufficient
>> on
>> its own so you have to search this database anyway. Thus starting at the
>> directory is equivalent to starting with the passport info.
>>
> Nope. Because with the passport information you are looking for one
> specific person.

I think you missed out how we got here.

The passport information you are collecting is of the random person who has
just walked through the check at the airport. I don't call this a specific
person.

tim




From: Bob Myers on
While the discussion of just what might or might not be
done with the information encoded in an RFID passport
is interesting, I think you're all missing a more fundamental
issue: no one has questioned the original assertion that it is
possible to read this data remotely in the first place. Is there
really ANY reason at all for believing that this can readily
be done with equipment small enough to be concealed on
a person?

Bob M.


From: Mxsmanic on
Bob Myers writes:

> Is there really ANY reason at all for believing that this can readily
> be done with equipment small enough to be concealed on
> a person?

Yes. It should be trivially easy. If you can put a GPS receiver in a
wristwatch, you can certainly put an RFID reader or sniffer in a space at
least as small.
From: William Black on
Mxsmanic wrote:
> Bob Myers writes:
>
>> Is there really ANY reason at all for believing that this can readily
>> be done with equipment small enough to be concealed on
>> a person?
>
> Yes. It should be trivially easy. If you can put a GPS receiver in a
> wristwatch, you can certainly put an RFID reader or sniffer in a space at
> least as small.

So why isn't Radio Shack selling them to every nerd in the world?


--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.
From: Mxsmanic on
William Black writes:

> So why isn't Radio Shack selling them to every nerd in the world?

Perhaps because there is no demand, and there might be legal complications as
well.