Prev: McDonald's conquest of France is now complete:McDonald'sopens at the Louvre
Next: scRunge The Turnip [WAS:Re: in your dreams morrow Duh..
From: Mitchell Holman on 7 Oct 2009 07:24 "Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )" <tribuyltinfpint(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:4ACB627F.227B5E5A(a)yahoo.co.uk: > > > Earl Evleth wrote: >> >> On 5/10/09 21:10, in article 4ACA448D.E54D36E4(a)yahoo.co.uk, "Bill >> Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )" >> <tribuyltinfpint(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > A Filet O Fish isn't a pizza, Earl. >> >> You got my point, but you remain this groups dummy. >> > I got your point? You claimed that pizza was more versatile. I > showed that this was simply an artefact of defining the hamburger > narrowly. You didn't refute. I win. Bonde Logic in a nutshell. If you can't "refute" whatever bizarre claim he is making then he "wins". Sheesh............
From: Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' ) on 7 Oct 2009 12:41 Mitchell Holman wrote: > > "Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )" > <tribuyltinfpint(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in > news:4ACB627F.227B5E5A(a)yahoo.co.uk: > > > > > > > Earl Evleth wrote: > >> > >> On 5/10/09 21:10, in article 4ACA448D.E54D36E4(a)yahoo.co.uk, "Bill > >> Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )" > >> <tribuyltinfpint(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> > >> > A Filet O Fish isn't a pizza, Earl. > >> > >> You got my point, but you remain this groups dummy. > >> > > I got your point? You claimed that pizza was more versatile. I > > showed that this was simply an artefact of defining the hamburger > > narrowly. You didn't refute. I win. > > Bonde Logic in a nutshell. If you can't "refute" whatever > bizarre claim he is making then he "wins". > The bizarre claim is from Earl, who insists that pizza is more "versatile" while narrowly construing "burger" to only be beef between two buns, probably specifically two white flour burger buns. My argument is that it is the definition he's attributed to "burger" that makes it less "versatile". All one would have to do is define "piazza" without allowing anything but cheese, and it would suddenly lose its "versatility" too. But he is right, pizza is more versatile if we include in it the ancient Roman dish known as "placenta". Anyone who has every watched barn animals give birth and then eat the placenta can't claim that Earl is wrong about pizza. -- What I hate about flip flops is the flip and the flop.
From: Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' ) on 7 Oct 2009 12:43 Mitchell Holman wrote: > > "Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )" > <tribuyltinfpint(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in > news:4ACB627F.227B5E5A(a)yahoo.co.uk: > > > > > > > Earl Evleth wrote: > >> > >> On 5/10/09 21:10, in article 4ACA448D.E54D36E4(a)yahoo.co.uk, "Bill > >> Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )" > >> <tribuyltinfpint(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> > >> > A Filet O Fish isn't a pizza, Earl. > >> > >> You got my point, but you remain this groups dummy. > >> > > I got your point? You claimed that pizza was more versatile. I > > showed that this was simply an artefact of defining the hamburger > > narrowly. You didn't refute. I win. > > Bonde Logic in a nutshell. If you can't "refute" whatever > bizarre claim he is making then he "wins". > The bizarre claim is from Earl, who insists that pizza is more "versatile" while narrowly construing "burger" to only be beef between two buns, probably specifically two white flour burger buns. My argument is that it is the definition he's attributed to "burger" that makes it less "versatile". All one would have to do is define "pizza" without allowing anything but cheese, and it would suddenly lose its "versatility" too. But he is right, pizza is more versatile if we include in it the ancient Roman dish known as "placenta". Anyone who has every watched barn animals give birth and then eat the placenta can't claim that Earl is wrong about pizza. -- What I hate about flip flops is the flip and the flop.
From: Dave Smith on 7 Oct 2009 15:27
Earl Evleth wrote: > On 7/10/09 18:41, in article 4ACCC4CC.3AAEB906(a)yahoo.co.uk, "Bill Bonde { > 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )" <tribuyltinfpint(a)yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> while narrowly construing "burger" to only be beef >> between two buns, > > > Right, you don't find a burger version with smoked salmon > as you do in French pizza. But you can make a salmonburger: Salmon Burgers with Lemon-Sour Cream Sauce 1 (14 3/4-ounce) can salmon, drained and flaked 2 egg whites, slightly beaten 3/4 cup bread crumbs* 1/2 cup chopped onion Salt and pepper to taste 1 tablespoon butter Lemon-Sour Cream Sauce (see recipe below) Lemon wedges *Check out Making Homemade Bread Crumbs. Prepare Lemon-Sour Cream Sauce; set aside. In a large bowl, combine salmon, egg whites, bread crumbs, onion, salt, and pepper; using your hands, shape into six equal-sized patties. In a large frying pan over medium heat, melt butter. Add salmon patties and brown on both sides. Remove from heat, transfer onto a serving platter, and serve with Lemon-Sour Cream Sauce and lemon wedges. LEMON-SOUR CREAM SAUCE: 1 cup fat-free sour cream 1 teaspoon grated lemon zest 2 tablespoons fresh lemon juice 1/2 teaspoon sugar |