From: Terry J. Wood on

>> Stimulus is a very context specific thing, too. So, alone, in a
>> room, with a come hither look from the Other Person and Woody would
>> return to full bloom even if the clothes had been off all day.

I never count Woody out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrhBd4hhihQ
From: Ari Silverstein on
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:29:32 -0500, Terry J. Wood wrote:

> All my friends met their mates at folk dances. In fact we couldn't
> beleive it when one of the women announced that she was dating her boss
> who didn't know how to dance. We wondered what they had in common. When
> they got married we wondered how long a "mixed" marrage (dancer/non-
> dancer) would last. What would they do on the weekends? :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4d7Wp9kKjA
--
Ari Silverstein, C.T.A; C.T.A.S, FREE Cruise Travel Advisory Services
www.cruisequick.com - able to offer some of the lowest prices and best
value added in the industry. (not affiliated)
From: Terry J. Wood on
Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:896p4lF6i1U1
@mid.individual.net:

> Are these written, minimum standards? What are these decorums?

Pretty much was the Bare Neccisties web site described.
From: stinson_home on
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:55:48 -0400, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:


> Be interesting to know how soon in the process they don't feel that.
>Erections are (I know this takes a lot of the fun out of it, but there
>you are) a physiological reaction to a stimulus.

Not everybody responds to a given stimulus in the same manner. Nor is
the response always the same.

>You see something
>often enough and the stimulation can go away.

And if you differentiate between appropriate response and
inappropriate response, there is a difference in the stimulation. Fire
can be threatening or welcoming, depending on the context. Nudity is
similar in that there is no universal response to it.

> I would think that the major difference in erections between
>nudists and non-nudists (sorry boys and girls but textiles is just too
>dumb a monicker for me to use), is that you see enough naked bodies in
>social settings and things (shall we say) "settle down".

If you're an adult, who can differentiate between a sexual setting and
a social one, things don't get riled up in the first place.

-T.
From: Kurt Ullman on
In article <qggs26tkk6q85u0d2sfd7fjnkvbrislts4(a)4ax.com>,
stinson_home(a)HOTMAIL.COM wrote:

> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:55:48 -0400, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >You see something
> >often enough and the stimulation can go away.
>
> And if you differentiate between appropriate response and
> inappropriate response, there is a difference in the stimulation. Fire
> can be threatening or welcoming, depending on the context. Nudity is
> similar in that there is no universal response to it.
Pretty much my point. But, the response to nudity (at least in the
US context) is largely societal and taught from infancy. So, there is a
certain amount of social relearning that usually has to take place
except in the second or third generation of nudists. It is how that
retraining takes place that is interesting.



>
> > I would think that the major difference in erections between
> >nudists and non-nudists (sorry boys and girls but textiles is just too
> >dumb a monicker for me to use), is that you see enough naked bodies in
> >social settings and things (shall we say) "settle down".
>
> If you're an adult, who can differentiate between a sexual setting and
> a social one, things don't get riled up in the first place.
>
But one of the key (again in the US context) differentiations
IS nudity. If you are nude, most likely it is perceived as a sexual
setting. Again, there is a little bit of social retraining that has to
be done to REMOVE the sexual part of nudity. (Which it looks like most
nudists accomplish).

--
I want to find a voracious, small-minded predator
and name it after the IRS.
Robert Bakker, paleontologist
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: CruiseQuick.com Update
Next: One of My Favorite Things