From: Larry in Berkeley on
RPSinha wrote:
> [Reposted with enlarged group list. Please leave rec.travel.air intact,
> I can only access replies there.]
>
> I am going to experiment with doing away with checked luggage and try
> traveling with just one carry-on.

Many airlines are now enforcing the old rule that a carryon may not
weigh more than seven kilos. But they will check it if it does. You
may want to be ready to take out anything that you do not want checked.

Larry in Berkeley, California

From: Larry in Berkeley on
RPSinha wrote:
> [Reposted with enlarged group list. Please leave rec.travel.air intact,
> I can only access replies there.]
>
> I am going to experiment with doing away with checked luggage and try
> traveling with just one carry-on.

Many airlines are now enforcing the old rule that a carryon may not
weigh more than seven kilos. But they will check it if it does. You
may want to be ready to take out anything that you do not want checked.

Larry in Berkeley, California

From: erilar on
In article <OApAg.884$uW1.647(a)dukeread06>, "rascal" <rascal22(a)cox.net>
wrote:

> No wheels. Despite what the "travel experts" may say, carry your bag for
> a
> couple of miles or so getting out of the airport and wheels become more
> attractive.


They also increase the weight.

--
Mary Loomer Oliver (aka Erilar),
philologist, biblioholic medievalist

http://www.airstreamcomm.net/~erilarlo


From: erilar on
In article <1154627173.544594.201150(a)h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"PeterL" <po.ning(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Miguel Cruz wrote:
> > "rascal" <rascal22(a)cox.net> wrote:
> > > Despite what the "travel experts" may say, carry your bag for a
> > > couple of miles or so getting out of the airport and wheels become
> > > more attractive.
> >
> > I cannot imagine a scenario in which a wheeled bag is more attractive,
> > unless it is so heavy that you simply cannot lift it - such as an
> > equipment container on 4 casters.
>
> Wait till you are 50 yrs old Miguel.

I'm 72 and wouldn't use a wheeled bag if it were free.

--
Mary Loomer Oliver (aka Erilar),
philologist, biblioholic medievalist

http://www.airstreamcomm.net/~erilarlo


From: rascal on
Yes, and that's a really good idea. I say shoot all the tourist as soon as
they show themselves. Carrying two bags should be prima fascia evidence of
tourism and give everyone the right to shoot them immediately. You surely
don't want to just wound them, so shooting to kill is the way to go.

"nobody" <nobody(a)nobody.org> wrote in message
news:44D23B6C.14AAB568(a)nobody.org...
> Miguel Cruz wrote:
>> I sometimes have to carry my luggage fairly long distances. For example,
>> last year I had to carry two bags (one large checked backpack, worn in
>> the back, one small carry-on backpack, worn in the front) from Istanbul
>> airport to the center of town because my ATM card had expired just
>
>
> Remember that you cannot do that in the UK anymore. Police will shoot to
> kill tourists with backpacks before they get a chance to ask any
> questions (and this policy is approved/condoned by the Bliar government).