Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
in [Europe]
|
Prev: Gary Spatz Acting Coach, Gary Spatz Mickey Mouse Club, Gary Spatz TV 184
Next: Gary Spatz Acting Coach - Gary Spatz - Gary Spatz Playground - Gary Spatz IMDb - 193
From: rick++ on 7 Apr 2010 15:50 I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has propose a platform. You cant run on negation forever. Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that.
From: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) on 7 Apr 2010 17:35 rick++ wrote: > > I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has > propose > a platform. You cant run on negation forever. > Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at > each others throats then. The conservatives promote government > intervention > in social issues, while libs abhor that. > Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in social issues. -- "It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.", Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981)
From: FACE on 7 Apr 2010 17:58 On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT), in uk.politics.misc, "rick++" <rick303(a)hotmail.com>, wrote >I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has >propose >a platform. You cant run on negation forever. >Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at >each others throats then. The conservatives promote government >intervention >in social issues, while libs abhor that. Libs promote government intervention in every aspect of life. FACE
From: Om Nitron on 7 Apr 2010 17:34 Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: > rick++ wrote: > >> >>Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at >>each others throats then. The conservatives promote government >>intervention >>in social issues, while libs abhor that. >> > > Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in > social issues. Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin.
From: Om Nitron on 7 Apr 2010 17:35
FACE wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:58 PM: > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT), in uk.politics.misc, "rick++" > <rick303(a)hotmail.com>, wrote > >>I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has >>propose >>a platform. You cant run on negation forever. >>Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at >>each others throats then. The conservatives promote government >>intervention >>in social issues, while libs abhor that. > > Libs promote government intervention in every aspect of life. You're as much of an illiterate idiot as Bonde. The "libs" are the **LIBERTARIANS**, twit. |