Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
in [Europe]
|
Prev: Gary Spatz Acting Coach, Gary Spatz Mickey Mouse Club, Gary Spatz TV 184
Next: Gary Spatz Acting Coach - Gary Spatz - Gary Spatz Playground - Gary Spatz IMDb - 193
From: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) on 7 Apr 2010 19:04 Om Nitron wrote: > > Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On > 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: > > > rick++ wrote: > > > >> > >>Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at > >>each others throats then. The conservatives promote government > >>intervention > >>in social issues, while libs abhor that. > >> > > > > Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in > > social issues. > > Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are > the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin. > Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are Libertarians. -- "It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.", Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981)
From: Kenneth McVay OBC on 7 Apr 2010 18:37 In article <4BBCFA9D.A4779ADB(a)yahoo.co.uk>, Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) <triuytinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > >rick++ wrote: >> >> I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has >> propose >> a platform. You cant run on negation forever. >> Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at >> each others throats then. The conservatives promote government >> intervention >> in social issues, while libs abhor that. >Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in >social issues. Nah.... forcing an entire nation to buy HC insurance isn't a "social issue," nah, it's, er, for your own good. Wasting tax money on a tunnel in Florida for turtles isn't a "social issue," nah, it's er, for your own good... I mean, turtle road kill is just WRONG, man... Progressives NEVER meddle in "social issues." Just ask ACORN :-) -- "The Nizkor website (secretly financed by the ADL and other Jewish front organizations) is behind it." (David Irving, whining about Google's reminder of his disgrace.) The facts: http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irving-david/judgment-00-00.html
From: Donna Evleth on 8 Apr 2010 08:17 > From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)" > <triuytinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> > Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to > those who come after us. > Newsgroups: > alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe > Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000 > Subject: Re: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44% > > > > Om Nitron wrote: >> >> Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On >> 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: >> >>> rick++ wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at >>>> each others throats then. The conservatives promote government >>>> intervention >>>> in social issues, while libs abhor that. >>>> >>> >>> Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in >>> social issues. >> >> Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are >> the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin. >> > Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are > Libertarians. I thought you loved abbreviations. You just got caught on one that was extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it right away. However, since this abbreviation caught you, it should be a lesson: avoid abbreviations, spell it out. Donna Evleth > > > > > -- > "It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for > argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our > federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers > delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or > to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the > Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.", > Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981)
From: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) on 8 Apr 2010 12:07 Donna Evleth wrote: > > > From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)" > > <triuytinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> > > Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to > > those who come after us. > > Newsgroups: > > alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe > > Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000 > > Subject: Re: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44% > > > > > > > > Om Nitron wrote: > >> > >> Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On > >> 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: > >> > >>> rick++ wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at > >>>> each others throats then. The conservatives promote government > >>>> intervention > >>>> in social issues, while libs abhor that. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in > >>> social issues. > >> > >> Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are > >> the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin. > >> > > Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are > > Libertarians. > > I thought you loved abbreviations. > There is no abbreviation for "libertarian" that isn't overloaded with "liberal". Do you support overloaded abbreviations now? > You just got caught on one that was > extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it > right away. > I didn't read the context because it's irrelevant. "Lib" is short for liberal or Liberal. > However, since this abbreviation caught you, it should be a lesson: avoid > abbreviations, spell it out. > When overloaded abbreviations exist, the question should be will there be ambiguity. In the case of using the same short form for two political groups, yes. If the compiler could disambiguate, fine, but it can't. -- "It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.", Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981)
From: Donna Evleth on 9 Apr 2010 06:43
> From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)" > <triuytinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> > Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to > those who come after us. > Newsgroups: > alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe > Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:07:21 +0000 > Subject: Re: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44% > > > > Donna Evleth wrote: >> >>> From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)" >>> <triuytinafpant(a)yahoo.co.uk> >>> Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to >>> those who come after us. >>> Newsgroups: >>> alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe >>> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000 >>> Subject: Re: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44% >>> >>> >>> >>> Om Nitron wrote: >>>> >>>> Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On >>>> 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: >>>> >>>>> rick++ wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at >>>>>> each others throats then. The conservatives promote government >>>>>> intervention >>>>>> in social issues, while libs abhor that. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in >>>>> social issues. >>>> >>>> Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are >>>> the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin. >>>> >>> Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are >>> Libertarians. >> >> I thought you loved abbreviations. >> > There is no abbreviation for "libertarian" that isn't overloaded > with "liberal". Do you support overloaded abbreviations now? I don't support abbreviations at all as a general rule. > > > >> You just got caught on one that was >> extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it >> right away. >> > I didn't read the context because it's irrelevant. "Lib" is short > for liberal or Liberal. I will repeat, I will even shout: CONTEXT IS ALWAYS RELEVANT. In fact, it is the most relevant element of most paragraphs. The bottom line is that because you ignored context, you got caught. Donna Evleth |