From: joker3304 on
Ray,

You are comparing apples and oranges. I can do my research on a car
and test drive it. If I then made a mistake it would be on me. As
you know, many software programs purport compatibility with operating
systems and other programs and make claims as to what they will do.
Once you open the box, which is the only way to find out if they will
live up to their claims, the companies will not take the product back.
It isn't the same. We are not talking about many programs that I
have asked to try, but I can tell you I have wasted more money because
of fraudulent claims of software vendors than I care to remember.

Art

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:50:45 -0800, Ray Goldenberg
<ray(a)lighthousetravel.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:27:44 GMT, www.ttdown.com
><joker3304(a)nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Regarding my posting history, which I don't believe has any relavence.
>>in this discussion other than in your mind, I have been a victim of
>>software that purports to work and do certain things and then does not
>>live up to its hipe. I try some software out and when it does what I
>>want, I buy it. I am sure with your supersleuth means, you can check
>>my purchase history at fry's or best buy and find I have purchased the
>>majority of software in question.
>
>Hi Art,
>
>That is interesting. I have bought some cars that I have not liked
>after I drove them but it was to late to take them back to the dealer.
>Maybe next time I should follow your lead and just go steal one and
>drive it around for awhile. <:+)
>
>Best regards,
>Ray
>LIGHTHOUSE TRAVEL
>800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905
>http://www.lighthousetravel.com

no email, just post response
From: www.ttdown.com on
I doubt that you saw quite a few because it is an untruth. I did ask
for some for the reasons I said. You have every right to disagree, I
take exception to the ad hominem attack on me changes the issue. When
you argue the issue you have the same right to disagree with me as I
do with you. When you attack me it shows either that you can not
really support your position, or that your position does not matter,
you are just arguing for the sake of it.

Art

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:10:36 -0500, Lee Lindquist <no(a)2.spam> wrote:

>On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:27:44 GMT, www.ttdown.com
><joker3304(a)nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Regarding my posting history, which I don't believe has any relavence.
>>in this discussion other than in your mind, I have been a victim of
>>software that purports to work and do certain things and then does not
>
>You must have quite a bad record with software, as I
>saw quite a few posts by you looking for cracks.
>
>The only reason I mentioned it at all, was that you claimed
>I had no integrity. ...simply because I disagree with you
>that princess has the right to change their policies.

no email, just post response
From: joker3304 on
Google had 78 references to my ID. The majority by far are on this
and the European travel usenet groups. There are in fact several
posts with this ID which are apparently people in Europe posting about
hotels in places I have never been. The few and I mean few posts were
not for multiple pieces of software info, but in fact the same post on
multiple usenet groups. I think people can draw their own
conclusions.


On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:56:18 -0500, Lee Lindquist <no(a)2.spam> wrote:

>On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 02:40:41 GMT, www.ttdown.com
><joker3304(a)nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>I doubt that you saw quite a few because it is an untruth. I did ask
>
>Anyone is free to look in google and draw their own conclusion.
>
>>for some for the reasons I said. You have every right to disagree, I
>>take exception to the ad hominem attack on me changes the issue. When
>>you argue the issue you have the same right to disagree with me as I
>>do with you. When you attack me it shows either that you can not
>>really support your position, or that your position does not matter,
>>you are just arguing for the sake of it.
>
>Gee Art, you've got quite the double standard on posting.
>Your posts certainly don't stick to any issue.
>
>For instance, in this thread you've posted:
>
>"I can pay for whatever
>I need, it is a matter of principle and honesty. If you do not
>understand that I can understand. Princess is obviously run by people
>just like you. "
>
>"By the way, when you are yawning dion'r fall asleep at the wheel.
>You apparently do that alot. "
>
>"The issue, which I fully understand you would not get, is integrity."
>
>See ya, Art.

no email, just post response
From: LeeNY on
On Feb 22, 8:11 pm, Lee Lindquist <n...(a)2.spam> wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2007 10:58:37 -0800, "LeeNY" <lees...(a)campmor.com> wrote:
>
> >cruises. I just wanna shake 'em and say, " do you know how many
> >thousands of $$ you spent to "achieve" this "honor"? I don't get it at
> >all...passengers PAY for those 100 days...they're being recognized for
> >spending enough $$?
>
> ...how is this different from buy an expensive car?

I don't understand the analogy...

Lee


>
> --
> - Lee