Reid Lead Widens Over Really Dumb Cavewoman
in [Las Vegas]
|
Prev: Lesson time again
Next: Walt TR - Part 1 of 2
From: AuntyPalin on 17 Jul 2010 03:07 "Joe J" <joejak(a)prodigy.net> wrote: >Snip >"octoad" <davko58(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >> This race should serve as a lesson to those Repubs who are >> ignorant enough to support Sarah "The Quitter" Palin for president, but it >> won't. >> LOL. >> O > >Hush, I think she is the perfect candidate for 2012 and stop discouraging >them! <wags finger> I know what you're up to! Don't forget, W. Bush got elected twice. And ask yourself, is this country getting dumb or dumber?
From: tom ronson on 17 Jul 2010 10:54 bobbi wrote: > How's that hopey-changey thing working for you?? lol --- pretty damned good. thank you for asking. I mean anything that gets John of Orange so wound up he can't speak must be great. and I'd like to point out that if you boys had such a great program why do you keep losing to lowly democrats? hmmmmmm? not sure why but I feel like a cup of tea about now. hmmmm. tea. -- --tr
From: Kurt Ullman on 17 Jul 2010 12:52 In article <i1sg76$31p$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, tom ronson <theavlv.ronson(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > bobbi wrote: > > and I'd like to point out that if you boys had such a great program why > do you keep losing to lowly democrats? hmmmmmm? That's rich for a group that spent 14 years in the wilderness and looks poised to return there a scant 6 years or so after coming out. -- I want to find a voracious, small-minded predator and name it after the IRS. Robert Bakker, paleontologist
From: Double Down Now! on 17 Jul 2010 13:15 On Jul 16, 12:23 pm, "octoad" <davk...(a)sonic.net> wrote: > Think Reid will be airing more negative ads in the several months left > before the election? DOH. Hard to believe the Repubs were stupid enough > not to nominate some normal, halfway bright conservative to run against the > wildly unpopular Reid in a state which is near the top in foreclosures and > unemployment, but nope, they chose Miss Tea Party. > If Lowden hadn't self-imploded with her chickens-for-healthcare idiocy, the Pukes might have had a chance against Reid. Now with the extremist Angle, the Pukes are doomed, and I'm lovin' it :-)
From: tom ronson on 17 Jul 2010 17:09
Kurt Ullman wrote: > I gave you two more years to avoid it. Or did I do the math wrong? just like you man, I'm along for the ride into the brick wall. >You apparently don't learn from your failures any more than the GOP does. I don't set policy but there's been a lot done in the past 18 months, and despite FAUX newz reports is not all bad. I know ALL of it must be repealed immediately, but it won't happen. > old same old, vote for change again, SSDD. yep. but your guys aren't even making believe anymore. it confounds the mind. > Yeah. The Dems showed so much class talking about how the > electorate was so stupid they voted for the GOP. hey, look at what happened. they drove the car into the ditch..... and now they want the keys back.... for what? to drive it off a cliff? I'm not sure that asking about intelligence is all that wrong here. > Nope,. Because if you look at the actual money coming in, you will > note that the first year the revenues go down a little, but the second > year they are at least back to what they were and after that they go > up.. at least with the first Bush and the Reagan, the increases are > faster for the next few years than they were the years before. There > generally is NO lost revenue. hmmmm, Reagan's budget director doesn't agree with you. Failed S&L's littered the landscape when Reagan left. Bush cut taxes, look at what happened. Complete failure. How many times do we have to repeat that demonstration for it to get flagged as maybe something we shouldn't be doing? iows I've yet to see supply siders pull it off. I have seen it go down in flames twice, in my lifetime. > If you factor in the scoring from the Joint Committee on Taxation, > the increases in revenue are even more so. then where did all that money go then? > Class act, there. what can I say? I learned at an early age not to place my hand on a kitchen burner. I did it once. that was enough. but now I see a group of guys --- guys who seem to be on the planet solely to serve businesses at MY expense, who want to repeat every step of how we ended up upside down. but given their audience I suppose that's all they need to come up with. -- --tr |