Prev: Lesson time again
Next: Walt TR - Part 1 of 2
From: jerry the jerk on 20 Jul 2010 15:08
On Jul 17 2010 10:15 AM, Double Down Now! wrote:

> On Jul 16, 12:23�pm, "octoad" <davk...(a)sonic.net> wrote:
> > Think Reid will be airing more negative ads in the several months left
> > before the election? �DOH. �Hard to believe the Repubs were stupid enough
> > not to nominate some normal, halfway bright conservative to run against the
> > wildly unpopular Reid in a state which is near the top in foreclosures and
> > unemployment, but nope, they chose Miss Tea Party.
> >
>
>
> If Lowden hadn't self-imploded with her chickens-for-healthcare
> idiocy, the Pukes might have had a chance against Reid. Now with the
> extremist Angle, the Pukes are doomed, and I'm lovin' it :-)

Sharon Angle allowed one small quote to define her position on social
security and it caused her trouble. She never had a chance to fully
explain what she meant by phasing out social security.
Back in the early 70's a senator called for the same thing. He proposed a
40-50 year phaseout of social security with everyone converting over to a
private retirement plan. Allowing 40-50 years for the phaseout would do no
harm to anyone collecting social security and people retiring with a
private retirement plan would have more money than what they would receive
under social security. Some committee in the senate actually discussed
this phaseout, but it got dumped and never went anyplace. Why??
For one reason...it would have resulted in the termination of over 1000
social security jobs during the phaseout.
Don't believe me? It actually happened and I liked the plan myself.

________________________________________________________________________�
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Lesson time again
Next: Walt TR - Part 1 of 2