From: Stu on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:00:56 -0400, Sue Mullen <kjmullen(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:51:36 -0400, Thumper wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:46 -0400, Ohioguy <none(a)none.net> wrote:
>>
>>> So they are bragging about getting people to spend lots of extra $$
>>>on the ship, and then saying they will be focusing on ways to get that
>>>to work on older cruise ships as well?
>>>
>>> Doesn't exactly make me more optimistic about going on a cruise trip.
>>> I usually spend between $100-$400 for a week vacation, depending on
>>>whether we go camping where it is free (still have to pay gas and pack
>>>food) or stay at a hotel. If I'm spending $1k per person for a cruise,
>>>I expect most everything there to be 'free', since I already feel like
>>>I'm paying out the wazoo for the experience.
>>
>> $100 a week? Bullshit.
>> Thumper
>
>Thumper, please clean up your language or Jean andd George will demand
>that you be killfiled.

Oh I doubt that
From: Becca on
On 6/19/2010 6:40 AM, Harry Cooper wrote:
> Hi Becca,
>
> I think Linnie's post should be required reading for all married men
> on the newsgroup. Seems to me that she told it like it is.
>
> Harry Cooper

Sometimes it is fun to rent a condo or to stay in a campground, I enjoy
doing that like most people, and I have to agree that Lennie is right.
Somebody, and it doesn't necessarily have to be the wife, many husbands
also cook & clean, but somebody is going to have to do the meal
planning, the grocery shopping, cooking, lunch packing, washing dishes
and making the beds. When you go on a cruise, you do not have to worry
about any of that.

Becca

Becca
From: Thumper on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:00:56 -0400, Sue Mullen <kjmullen(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:51:36 -0400, Thumper wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:46 -0400, Ohioguy <none(a)none.net> wrote:
>>
>>> So they are bragging about getting people to spend lots of extra $$
>>>on the ship, and then saying they will be focusing on ways to get that
>>>to work on older cruise ships as well?
>>>
>>> Doesn't exactly make me more optimistic about going on a cruise trip.
>>> I usually spend between $100-$400 for a week vacation, depending on
>>>whether we go camping where it is free (still have to pay gas and pack
>>>food) or stay at a hotel. If I'm spending $1k per person for a cruise,
>>>I expect most everything there to be 'free', since I already feel like
>>>I'm paying out the wazoo for the experience.
>>
>> $100 a week? Bullshit.
>> Thumper
>
>Thumper, please clean up your language or Jean andd George will demand
>that you be killfiled.

I don't have any problem at all with people kill filing me if they
don't want to read my posts.

It's still bullshit.
Thumper
From: Jack Hamilton on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:44:27 -0400, Thumper <jaylsmith(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:00:56 -0400, Sue Mullen <kjmullen(a)comcast.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:51:36 -0400, Thumper wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:46 -0400, Ohioguy <none(a)none.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So they are bragging about getting people to spend lots of extra $$
>>>>on the ship, and then saying they will be focusing on ways to get that
>>>>to work on older cruise ships as well?
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't exactly make me more optimistic about going on a cruise trip.
>>>> I usually spend between $100-$400 for a week vacation, depending on
>>>>whether we go camping where it is free (still have to pay gas and pack
>>>>food) or stay at a hotel. If I'm spending $1k per person for a cruise,
>>>>I expect most everything there to be 'free', since I already feel like
>>>>I'm paying out the wazoo for the experience.
>>>
>>> $100 a week? Bullshit.
>>> Thumper
>>
>>Thumper, please clean up your language or Jean andd George will demand
>>that you be killfiled.
>
>I don't have any problem at all with people kill filing me if they
>don't want to read my posts.
>
>It's still bullshit.
>Thumper

The post to which you are responding was a forgery.
From: Sue Mullen on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:17:13 -0700, Jack Hamilton wrote:

> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:44:27 -0400, Thumper <jaylsmith(a)comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:00:56 -0400, Sue Mullen <kjmullen(a)comcast.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:51:36 -0400, Thumper wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:46 -0400, Ohioguy <none(a)none.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So they are bragging about getting people to spend lots of extra $$
>>>>>on the ship, and then saying they will be focusing on ways to get that
>>>>>to work on older cruise ships as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't exactly make me more optimistic about going on a cruise trip.
>>>>> I usually spend between $100-$400 for a week vacation, depending on
>>>>>whether we go camping where it is free (still have to pay gas and pack
>>>>>food) or stay at a hotel. If I'm spending $1k per person for a cruise,
>>>>>I expect most everything there to be 'free', since I already feel like
>>>>>I'm paying out the wazoo for the experience.
>>>>
>>>> $100 a week? Bullshit.
>>>> Thumper
>>>
>>>Thumper, please clean up your language or Jean andd George will demand
>>>that you be killfiled.
>>
>>I don't have any problem at all with people kill filing me if they
>>don't want to read my posts.
>>
>>It's still bullshit.
>>Thumper
>
> The post to which you are responding was a forgery.

Careful, Jack, Jean and George are watching you, posting lies and
deceit will make them think you are the sicko retarded troll that they
hate...in their endearing Christian love, of course.
--
sue