From: Stu on 19 Jun 2010 11:08 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:00:56 -0400, Sue Mullen <kjmullen(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:51:36 -0400, Thumper wrote: > >> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:46 -0400, Ohioguy <none(a)none.net> wrote: >> >>> So they are bragging about getting people to spend lots of extra $$ >>>on the ship, and then saying they will be focusing on ways to get that >>>to work on older cruise ships as well? >>> >>> Doesn't exactly make me more optimistic about going on a cruise trip. >>> I usually spend between $100-$400 for a week vacation, depending on >>>whether we go camping where it is free (still have to pay gas and pack >>>food) or stay at a hotel. If I'm spending $1k per person for a cruise, >>>I expect most everything there to be 'free', since I already feel like >>>I'm paying out the wazoo for the experience. >> >> $100 a week? Bullshit. >> Thumper > >Thumper, please clean up your language or Jean andd George will demand >that you be killfiled. Oh I doubt that
From: Becca on 19 Jun 2010 12:26 On 6/19/2010 6:40 AM, Harry Cooper wrote: > Hi Becca, > > I think Linnie's post should be required reading for all married men > on the newsgroup. Seems to me that she told it like it is. > > Harry Cooper Sometimes it is fun to rent a condo or to stay in a campground, I enjoy doing that like most people, and I have to agree that Lennie is right. Somebody, and it doesn't necessarily have to be the wife, many husbands also cook & clean, but somebody is going to have to do the meal planning, the grocery shopping, cooking, lunch packing, washing dishes and making the beds. When you go on a cruise, you do not have to worry about any of that. Becca Becca
From: Thumper on 19 Jun 2010 15:44 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:00:56 -0400, Sue Mullen <kjmullen(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:51:36 -0400, Thumper wrote: > >> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:46 -0400, Ohioguy <none(a)none.net> wrote: >> >>> So they are bragging about getting people to spend lots of extra $$ >>>on the ship, and then saying they will be focusing on ways to get that >>>to work on older cruise ships as well? >>> >>> Doesn't exactly make me more optimistic about going on a cruise trip. >>> I usually spend between $100-$400 for a week vacation, depending on >>>whether we go camping where it is free (still have to pay gas and pack >>>food) or stay at a hotel. If I'm spending $1k per person for a cruise, >>>I expect most everything there to be 'free', since I already feel like >>>I'm paying out the wazoo for the experience. >> >> $100 a week? Bullshit. >> Thumper > >Thumper, please clean up your language or Jean andd George will demand >that you be killfiled. I don't have any problem at all with people kill filing me if they don't want to read my posts. It's still bullshit. Thumper
From: Jack Hamilton on 19 Jun 2010 18:17 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:44:27 -0400, Thumper <jaylsmith(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:00:56 -0400, Sue Mullen <kjmullen(a)comcast.net> >wrote: > >>On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:51:36 -0400, Thumper wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:46 -0400, Ohioguy <none(a)none.net> wrote: >>> >>>> So they are bragging about getting people to spend lots of extra $$ >>>>on the ship, and then saying they will be focusing on ways to get that >>>>to work on older cruise ships as well? >>>> >>>> Doesn't exactly make me more optimistic about going on a cruise trip. >>>> I usually spend between $100-$400 for a week vacation, depending on >>>>whether we go camping where it is free (still have to pay gas and pack >>>>food) or stay at a hotel. If I'm spending $1k per person for a cruise, >>>>I expect most everything there to be 'free', since I already feel like >>>>I'm paying out the wazoo for the experience. >>> >>> $100 a week? Bullshit. >>> Thumper >> >>Thumper, please clean up your language or Jean andd George will demand >>that you be killfiled. > >I don't have any problem at all with people kill filing me if they >don't want to read my posts. > >It's still bullshit. >Thumper The post to which you are responding was a forgery.
From: Sue Mullen on 19 Jun 2010 19:03 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:17:13 -0700, Jack Hamilton wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:44:27 -0400, Thumper <jaylsmith(a)comcast.net> > wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:00:56 -0400, Sue Mullen <kjmullen(a)comcast.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:51:36 -0400, Thumper wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:46 -0400, Ohioguy <none(a)none.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So they are bragging about getting people to spend lots of extra $$ >>>>>on the ship, and then saying they will be focusing on ways to get that >>>>>to work on older cruise ships as well? >>>>> >>>>> Doesn't exactly make me more optimistic about going on a cruise trip. >>>>> I usually spend between $100-$400 for a week vacation, depending on >>>>>whether we go camping where it is free (still have to pay gas and pack >>>>>food) or stay at a hotel. If I'm spending $1k per person for a cruise, >>>>>I expect most everything there to be 'free', since I already feel like >>>>>I'm paying out the wazoo for the experience. >>>> >>>> $100 a week? Bullshit. >>>> Thumper >>> >>>Thumper, please clean up your language or Jean andd George will demand >>>that you be killfiled. >> >>I don't have any problem at all with people kill filing me if they >>don't want to read my posts. >> >>It's still bullshit. >>Thumper > > The post to which you are responding was a forgery. Careful, Jack, Jean and George are watching you, posting lies and deceit will make them think you are the sicko retarded troll that they hate...in their endearing Christian love, of course. -- sue
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: A few last questions...luggage tags and cell phone Next: Happy Father's Day |