The logic of the Right....
in [Las Vegas]
|
Prev: DEMOCRAT Charlie Rangel charged with multiple ethics violations
Next: THE DARWINIST "ATHEISTS" TECHNIQUES OF CLAMOR AND DEMAGOGUERY
From: octoad on 26 Jul 2010 19:41 "tom ronson" <theavlv.ronson(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:i2hv5p$tbf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > BR Eagle wrote: > >> It's ok to personally attack the likes of Palin, Dubya, Angle..but >> stay away from Slick Willie and his wife*, and of course POTUS and any >> of his appointees! > > I'm going to ignore this due to the obvious... > >> btw, I noticed Crist in Florida and Harry have slim leads in the >> polls, but as you like to say, it's early. > > slim? 7 points ain't slim. Now if you cling to Rasmussen then yes it's > slim --- but given they're always off by themselves trending R I don't > given them much credence. > > But to repeat --- you noted that Crist has a "slight lead" (at 7 > points) ---- which is not getting killed by Rubio as I was told just this > past Friday. Kind of amazing, huh? The most watched cable news channel and the most listened to talk radio entertainers all say the Tea Party is like a new American Revolution. But the Americans won that one, didn't they? In 3 of the biggest senate showdowns they've been telling us that Angle, Rubio, and Fiorina were shoo-ins. I mean how could they lose to Reid, Crist, and Boxer? Reid is the Dem senate leader, Crist is a (gasp, horrors) RINO, and Boxer is the most liberal senator there is. Even if the tea partiers win, it will be in squeakers. With a national unemployment rate over 9% shouldn't they be dominating like SeanRushBeck keeps telling us? Hmm. Florida, Nevada, California. What do they have in common? I know this is assumed to hurt Repubs in future campaigns starting in a few more years, but just maybe.......... Just maybe that hispanic effect is having an effect now. But man, whatever the reasons these Tea Partiers are behind right now, if they lose this year they're done, finis, its over. The economy will inevitably improve at least some by 2012 from where it is now, and all those now 16 year old hispanic kids will be turning voting age as more old white people die off in the meantime. Its now or never for the old angry white FOX addicted 1964 Goldwater Republicans, and its looking more and more like never................. O
From: Cat_in_awe on 4 Aug 2010 16:04 Kurt Ullman wrote: > In article <i2htk7$tnb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > tom ronson <theavlv.ronson(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Mr Fluffer wrote: >> >>> Oh, that wonderful rapist Democrat Clinton!! >> >> if *anyone* needs proof of the ignorance of the right I submit this >> as proof positive. > > Wasn't a rapist. A serial adulterer, yes. All were over age and > consensual. Tell Juanita Broaddrick.
From: Cat_in_awe on 4 Aug 2010 16:08
jerry the jerk wrote: > On Jul 26 2010 8:37 AM, tom ronson wrote: > >> Kurt Ullman wrote: >> >>> You telling me that I am wrong? Look it up. >> >> dude --- here's the deal. If you want to hang Bush's mess around >> Obama's neck then those are the rules of engagement. I mean you >> sound like that fencepost, Sharon Angle who in one breath blames >> Reid for our employment woes then says its not a senator's job to >> create jobs. >> >> Or do you think you're talking to some douche bagger who can't >> sequence? >> >> And you really need to look at Reagan's first budget director's >> comments about the California Cabal spending like drunken buffoons >> and then get back to me. >> >> -- >> "You're just trying to bring back trickle down economics and the >> electorate is sick of getting trickled on." -- Thumper >> >> --tr > > Sharon is right. It is not the job of a us senator to create jobs. It > is the job of congress to run the economy in a way that allows state > and local government to create jobs for the people. Hard to get that many things wrong in one sentence. The economy is not supposed to be 'run' by the government. Nor is it the state or local government's job to create jobs. It's that kind of moronic thinking that has gotten us into this mess in the first place. |