From: Double Down Now! on 27 Jul 2010 19:36 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
From: LVTravel on 27 Jul 2010 21:34 "Double Down Now!" <double.down.now(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:65625000-7f91-4974-87e3-2a4c12bd7059(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ Yes it is and I have been seriously considering it but without knowing how many homes in a community will be unoccupied in the next year, those community association fees could become astronomical in a short period of time when you have to pay for all the upkeep to 1/2 of the community property as you and one other family are the only two there.
From: jerry the jerk on 27 Jul 2010 22:42 On Jul 27 2010 6:34 PM, LVTravel wrote: > "Double Down Now!" <double.down.now(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:65625000-7f91-4974-87e3-2a4c12bd7059(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ > > Yes it is and I have been seriously considering it but without knowing how > many homes in a community will be unoccupied in the next year, those > community association fees could become astronomical in a short period of > time when you have to pay for all the upkeep to 1/2 of the community > property as you and one other family are the only two there. I'm moving into an HOA that has 335 residents. If houses go vacant, the HOA will be terminated long before the dues go skyhigh. Nothing to worry about. ____________________________________________________________________� RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
From: za kAT on 27 Jul 2010 22:23 On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:42:01 -0700, jerry the jerk wrote: > On Jul 27 2010 6:34 PM, LVTravel wrote: > >> "Double Down Now!" <double.down.now(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:65625000-7f91-4974-87e3-2a4c12bd7059(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... >>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ >> >> Yes it is and I have been seriously considering it but without knowing how >> many homes in a community will be unoccupied in the next year, those >> community association fees could become astronomical in a short period of >> time when you have to pay for all the upkeep to 1/2 of the community >> property as you and one other family are the only two there. > > I'm moving into an HOA that has 335 residents. If houses go vacant, the > HOA will be terminated long before the dues go skyhigh. > Nothing to worry about. Except for all the services that the HOA was paying for won't any longer be available. Good thinking. Who needs common area sprinklering, lawn maintenance and security. -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: Las Vegas Don on 27 Jul 2010 23:49
On Jul 27, 9:23 pm, za kAT <za...(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:42:01 -0700, jerry the jerk wrote: > > On Jul 27 2010 6:34 PM, LVTravel wrote: > > >> "Double Down Now!" <double.down....(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > >>news:65625000-7f91-4974-87e3-2a4c12bd7059(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com.... > >>>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ > > >> Yes it is and I have been seriously considering it but without knowing how > >> many homes in a community will be unoccupied in the next year, those > >> community association fees could become astronomical in a short period of > >> time when you have to pay for all the upkeep to 1/2 of the community > >> property as you and one other family are the only two there. > > > I'm moving into an HOA that has 335 residents. If houses go vacant, the > > HOA will be terminated long before the dues go skyhigh. > > Nothing to worry about. > > Except for all the services that the HOA was paying for won't any > longer be available. > > Good thinking. Who needs common area sprinklering, lawn maintenance > and security. > -- > za...(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. > Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration! A friend just bout a 450k home for 175k. He worked the system for it and it did not come to him. Great for him. Don |