From: tim.... on 31 Jul 2010 08:22 "Martin" <martin(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:i3111a$7m8$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... > On 31/07/10 12:41, tim.... wrote: >> "Cliff Bott"<cliff_bott(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message >> news:54Q4o.2185$Yv.619(a)viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com... >>> I'm visiting those cities in that order in late September/early October >>> and I'd like advice on transport options - that is. air, rail or sea or >>> a >>> mix of these. My main concern is comfort and convenience rather than >>> price, but time is of concern as well. >> >> All of those routes currently have usable overnight rail services: >> >> AMS-CHP: depart 17:40 arrive 11:15. Day time journey is probably too >> long >> to consider useful. Overnight train can sometimes need to be booked >> several >> weeks ahead. >> >> CHP-STK: departure every 2 hours during the day taking 5:20, sometimes >> direct, sometimes by taking the local train to Malmo and changing (IME >> the >> onward connection will wait). Overnight train (M-F,Su) departs Malmo >> 22:48 >> arrives 7:05. All trains require reservation but usually not too far in >> advance, the further in advance you book the cheaper the fare (assuming >> you >> select the right options). >> >> STK-OSL: More difficult as in past years the direct trains have only >> operated in the summer and you are going in the winter. It's probably >> too >> early to tell what this year's timetable will be (if it does run, the >> times >> will be similar to the Malmo-Stockholm times as for part of the route >> they >> are the same trains - though obviously the return direction). There's >> lots >> of low cost flights on the route (which is why the train isn't frequent) >> but >> the airports aren't convenient to the city centre and are expensive and >> time >> consuming to get to. There are three express buses a day taking 8 hours >> but >> I guess that doesn't meet the "comfort" requirement. > > If he has limited time it is better to fly. An overnight train costs little real time. tim
From: Martin on 31 Jul 2010 09:27 On 31/07/10 14:22, tim.... wrote: > "Martin"<martin(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message > news:i3111a$7m8$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> On 31/07/10 12:41, tim.... wrote: >>> "Cliff Bott"<cliff_bott(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message >>> news:54Q4o.2185$Yv.619(a)viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com... >>>> I'm visiting those cities in that order in late September/early October >>>> and I'd like advice on transport options - that is. air, rail or sea or >>>> a >>>> mix of these. My main concern is comfort and convenience rather than >>>> price, but time is of concern as well. >>> >>> All of those routes currently have usable overnight rail services: >>> >>> AMS-CHP: depart 17:40 arrive 11:15. Day time journey is probably too >>> long >>> to consider useful. Overnight train can sometimes need to be booked >>> several >>> weeks ahead. >>> >>> CHP-STK: departure every 2 hours during the day taking 5:20, sometimes >>> direct, sometimes by taking the local train to Malmo and changing (IME >>> the >>> onward connection will wait). Overnight train (M-F,Su) departs Malmo >>> 22:48 >>> arrives 7:05. All trains require reservation but usually not too far in >>> advance, the further in advance you book the cheaper the fare (assuming >>> you >>> select the right options). >>> >>> STK-OSL: More difficult as in past years the direct trains have only >>> operated in the summer and you are going in the winter. It's probably >>> too >>> early to tell what this year's timetable will be (if it does run, the >>> times >>> will be similar to the Malmo-Stockholm times as for part of the route >>> they >>> are the same trains - though obviously the return direction). There's >>> lots >>> of low cost flights on the route (which is why the train isn't frequent) >>> but >>> the airports aren't convenient to the city centre and are expensive and >>> time >>> consuming to get to. There are three express buses a day taking 8 hours >>> but >>> I guess that doesn't meet the "comfort" requirement. >> >> If he has limited time it is better to fly. > > An overnight train costs little real time. Other than being dead the next day.How does the night sleeper price compare to an air fare between A'dam and Copenahagen.I don't mean with a normal 2nd class train ticket. If you are obsessed with train travel OK. Otherwise travel by air for long distances.
From: James Silverton on 31 Jul 2010 09:55 Martin wrote on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:27:26 +0200: > On 31/07/10 14:22, tim.... wrote: >> "Martin"<martin(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message >> news:i3111a$7m8$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> On 31/07/10 12:41, tim.... wrote: >>>> "Cliff Bott"<cliff_bott(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message >>>> news:54Q4o.2185$Yv.619(a)viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com... >>>>> I'm visiting those cities in that order in late >>>>> September/early October and I'd like advice on transport >>>>> options - that is. air, rail or sea or a mix of these. My >>>>> main concern is comfort and convenience rather than price, >>>>> but time is of concern as well. >>>> >>>> All of those routes currently have usable overnight rail services: >>>> >>>> AMS-CHP: depart 17:40 arrive 11:15. Day time journey is probably >>>> too >>>> long >>>> to consider useful. Overnight train can sometimes need to >>>> be booked several weeks ahead. >>>> >>>> CHP-STK: departure every 2 hours during the day taking 5:20, >>>> sometimes direct, sometimes by taking the local train to >>>> Malmo and changing (IME the onward connection will wait). >>>> Overnight train (M-F,Su) departs Malmo 22:48 arrives 7:05. All >>>> trains require reservation but usually not too far >>>> in advance, the further in advance you book the cheaper the >>>> fare (assuming you select the right options). >>>> >>>> STK-OSL: More difficult as in past years the direct trains have >>>> only operated in the summer and you are going in the >>>> winter. It's probably too early to tell what this year's >>>> timetable will be (if it does run, the times will be >>>> similar to the Malmo-Stockholm times as for part of the >>>> route they are the same trains - though obviously the >>>> return direction). There's lots of low cost flights on the >>>> route (which is why the train isn't frequent) but the >>>> airports aren't convenient to the city centre and are >>>> expensive and time consuming to get to. There are three >>>> express buses a day taking 8 hours but I guess that doesn't >>>> meet the "comfort" requirement. >>> >>> If he has limited time it is better to fly. >> >> An overnight train costs little real time. >Other than being dead the next day.How does the night sleeper price >compare to an air fare between A'dam and Copenahagen.I don't mean with >a normal 2nd class train ticket. >If you are obsessed with train travel OK. Otherwise travel by air for l>ong distances. Not just "dead" but grubby and with wrinkled clothes if you can't check into a hotel when you arrive. There are sleeper trains with showers but I can't speak about those routes. I have often wondered what advantage there is supposed to be about those fully reclining first class seats to Dubai, Japan and Europe. -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
From: Runge 124 on 31 Jul 2010 10:22 Keep on wondering "James Silverton" <not.jim.silverton(a)verizon.net> a �crit dans le message de groupe de discussion : i31a1e$be8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Martin wrote on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:27:26 +0200: > >> On 31/07/10 14:22, tim.... wrote: >>> "Martin"<martin(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:i3111a$7m8$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> On 31/07/10 12:41, tim.... wrote: >>>>> "Cliff Bott"<cliff_bott(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:54Q4o.2185$Yv.619(a)viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com... >>>>>> I'm visiting those cities in that order in late >>>>>> September/early October and I'd like advice on transport >>>>>> options - that is. air, rail or sea or a mix of these. My >>>>>> main concern is comfort and convenience rather than price, >>>>>> but time is of concern as well. >>>>> >>>>> All of those routes currently have usable overnight rail services: >>>>> >>>>> AMS-CHP: depart 17:40 arrive 11:15. Day time journey is probably too >>>>> long >>>>> to consider useful. Overnight train can sometimes need to >>>>> be booked several weeks ahead. >>>>> >>>>> CHP-STK: departure every 2 hours during the day taking 5:20, >>>>> sometimes direct, sometimes by taking the local train to >>>>> Malmo and changing (IME the onward connection will wait). Overnight >>>>> train (M-F,Su) departs Malmo 22:48 arrives 7:05. All trains require >>>>> reservation but usually not too far >>>>> in advance, the further in advance you book the cheaper the >>>>> fare (assuming you select the right options). >>>>> >>>>> STK-OSL: More difficult as in past years the direct trains have >>>>> only operated in the summer and you are going in the >>>>> winter. It's probably too early to tell what this year's >>>>> timetable will be (if it does run, the times will be >>>>> similar to the Malmo-Stockholm times as for part of the >>>>> route they are the same trains - though obviously the >>>>> return direction). There's lots of low cost flights on the >>>>> route (which is why the train isn't frequent) but the >>>>> airports aren't convenient to the city centre and are >>>>> expensive and time consuming to get to. There are three >>>>> express buses a day taking 8 hours but I guess that doesn't >>>>> meet the "comfort" requirement. >>>> >>>> If he has limited time it is better to fly. >>> >>> An overnight train costs little real time. > >>Other than being dead the next day.How does the night sleeper price >>compare to an air fare between A'dam and Copenahagen.I don't mean with a >>normal 2nd class train ticket. >>If you are obsessed with train travel OK. Otherwise travel by air for > l>ong distances. > > Not just "dead" but grubby and with wrinkled clothes if you can't check > into a hotel when you arrive. There are sleeper trains with showers but I > can't speak about those routes. I have often wondered what advantage there > is supposed to be about those fully reclining first class seats to Dubai, > Japan and Europe. > > -- > > James Silverton > Potomac, Maryland > > Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
From: Martin on 31 Jul 2010 10:59 On 31/07/10 15:55, James Silverton wrote: > Martin wrote on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:27:26 +0200: > >> On 31/07/10 14:22, tim.... wrote: >>> "Martin"<martin(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:i3111a$7m8$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> On 31/07/10 12:41, tim.... wrote: >>>>> "Cliff Bott"<cliff_bott(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:54Q4o.2185$Yv.619(a)viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com... >>>>>> I'm visiting those cities in that order in late >>>>>> September/early October and I'd like advice on transport >>>>>> options - that is. air, rail or sea or a mix of these. My >>>>>> main concern is comfort and convenience rather than price, >>>>>> but time is of concern as well. >>>>> >>>>> All of those routes currently have usable overnight rail services: >>>>> >>>>> AMS-CHP: depart 17:40 arrive 11:15. Day time journey is probably too >>>>> long >>>>> to consider useful. Overnight train can sometimes need to >>>>> be booked several weeks ahead. >>>>> >>>>> CHP-STK: departure every 2 hours during the day taking 5:20, >>>>> sometimes direct, sometimes by taking the local train to >>>>> Malmo and changing (IME the onward connection will wait). Overnight >>>>> train (M-F,Su) departs Malmo 22:48 arrives 7:05. All trains require >>>>> reservation but usually not too far >>>>> in advance, the further in advance you book the cheaper the >>>>> fare (assuming you select the right options). >>>>> >>>>> STK-OSL: More difficult as in past years the direct trains have >>>>> only operated in the summer and you are going in the >>>>> winter. It's probably too early to tell what this year's >>>>> timetable will be (if it does run, the times will be >>>>> similar to the Malmo-Stockholm times as for part of the >>>>> route they are the same trains - though obviously the >>>>> return direction). There's lots of low cost flights on the >>>>> route (which is why the train isn't frequent) but the >>>>> airports aren't convenient to the city centre and are >>>>> expensive and time consuming to get to. There are three >>>>> express buses a day taking 8 hours but I guess that doesn't >>>>> meet the "comfort" requirement. >>>> >>>> If he has limited time it is better to fly. >>> >>> An overnight train costs little real time. > >> Other than being dead the next day.How does the night sleeper price >> compare to an air fare between A'dam and Copenahagen.I don't mean with >> a normal 2nd class train ticket. >> If you are obsessed with train travel OK. Otherwise travel by air for > l>ong distances. > > Not just "dead" but grubby and with wrinkled clothes if you can't check > into a hotel when you arrive. I tried it once with a first class sleeper ticket from Toulouse to Paris. The train started shortly before midnight, the carriage rolled the whole way, I had difficulty sleeping and worse still the train arrived in Paris sometime around 5:30 am. I crossed Paris caught the connecting train which got me to The Hague around 1pm. I felt dreadful. Never again! There are sleeper trains with showers but > I can't speak about those routes. I have often wondered what advantage > there is supposed to be about those fully reclining first class seats to > Dubai, Japan and Europe. > I had one on a business class intercontinental flight with Air France flight I slept like a log and woke up with a hang over.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Currency exchanges in Budapest Next: michaelnewport's useful contris |