From: Surreyman on
On 18 Apr, 14:44, Tom P <werot...(a)freent.dd> wrote:
> Hatunen wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT), aquachimp
> > <aquach...(a)aquachimp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> On Apr 17, 12:14 pm, Martin <m...(a)address.invalid> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:27:31 +0200, Wolfgang Schwanke <s...(a)sig.nature> wrote:
> >>>> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgm...(a)earthlink.net>
> >>>> wrote innews:hq81gq04tv(a)news6.newsguy.com:
> >>>>> Interesting that the news story mentions the effects of an
> >>>>> 1821 eruption lasting for two years - that was before jet aircraft.  How
> >>>>> might a similar situation affect worldwide air travel, now?
> >>>> That was probably about the climatic effect. It's unlikely that
> >>>> aviation will be affected longer than a couple of days.
> >>> It is already longer than a couple of days :o)
> >>> --
>
> >>> Martin
> >> & what my wife wants to know is "how will Obama go to Poland for the
> >> funeral?"
>
> > He didn't.
>
> The other question being - if he did fly to Poland, what would they do
> if he couldn't fly back?
>
> BTW is anyone keeping track of which famous personalities are currently
> stranded in places they shouldn't be? Germany's PM Angela Merkel had her
> flight back from California diverted to Lisbon, from there she then flew
> to Rome and it seems they're planning to get her back to Berlin by road.
>
> T.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Seems the UK are now talking of sending in the Navy to 'rescue'
hundreds of thousands of stranded Brit tourists.
Personally, I don't think I'd want to be rescued!
From: Mxsmanic on
Hatunen writes:

> REally. That sounds rather authortitative. Have you a criterion,
> such as particles per cubic meter? Does it take into account
> particle size or composition? Where might we look this up on the
> Web?

Fly through it, and make me a liar. You can join a Polish president who
thought that his pilot was being too picky about safety, too.

In aviation, if you don't know, you don't go.
From: William Black on
Surreyman wrote:
> On 18 Apr, 14:44, Tom P <werot...(a)freent.dd> wrote:
>> Hatunen wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT), aquachimp
>>> <aquach...(a)aquachimp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 17, 12:14 pm, Martin <m...(a)address.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:27:31 +0200, Wolfgang Schwanke <s...(a)sig.nature> wrote:
>>>>>> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgm...(a)earthlink.net>
>>>>>> wrote innews:hq81gq04tv(a)news6.newsguy.com:
>>>>>>> Interesting that the news story mentions the effects of an
>>>>>>> 1821 eruption lasting for two years - that was before jet aircraft. How
>>>>>>> might a similar situation affect worldwide air travel, now?
>>>>>> That was probably about the climatic effect. It's unlikely that
>>>>>> aviation will be affected longer than a couple of days.
>>>>> It is already longer than a couple of days :o)
>>>>> --
>>>>> Martin
>>>> & what my wife wants to know is "how will Obama go to Poland for the
>>>> funeral?"
>>> He didn't.
>> The other question being - if he did fly to Poland, what would they do
>> if he couldn't fly back?
>>
>> BTW is anyone keeping track of which famous personalities are currently
>> stranded in places they shouldn't be? Germany's PM Angela Merkel had her
>> flight back from California diverted to Lisbon, from there she then flew
>> to Rome and it seems they're planning to get her back to Berlin by road.
>>
>> T.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Seems the UK are now talking of sending in the Navy to 'rescue'
> hundreds of thousands of stranded Brit tourists.
> Personally, I don't think I'd want to be rescued!

HMS Ocean and HMS Arc Royal are to be used a cross channel ferries,
three frigates/destroyers are being used to bring soldiers home after
they get as far as Spain.


--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.
From: d4g4h4 on
Jean O'Boyle <job1930(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

[]
> Oh, I know, everyone is ill informed except Evelyn....all those people who
> overwhelmingly listen to Fox have absolutely no intelligence...Evelyn is
> the only one who is the intelligent one vs. the millions that watch Fox.

It's pretty safe to say that anyone who prefers not to watch Fox News is
displaying at least a little intelligence. It is, simply put, as bad as
news can possibly get in a democracy. It is not about balance (as it
claims)- it's a skewed version of events packaged for rapid consumption
by stupid people. Of _course_ millions will watch it.

--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
www.davidhorne.net (email address on website)
"[Do you think the world learned anything from the first
world war?] No. They never learn." -Harry Patch (1898-2009)
From: S Viemeister on
On 4/19/2010 4:10 AM, Martin wrote:
> William Black<william.black(a)hotmail.co.uk>
>> Martin wrote:
>>> There is no fee involved. I receive BBC radio in the Netherlands via Internet.
>>
>> But not the TV shows on BBC iPlayer.
>
> Not even if you are willing to pay a full UK licence fee. I think Evelyn can
> probably get one of the BBC Worldwide satellite channels for a fee.

That really annoys me - I pay that fee every year. It would be great if
there were some way for licence-payers to sign in, and be able to use
the iPlayer while out of the UK.