UK closed
in [Europe]
|
Prev: Gary Spatz Best Acting Teacher, Gary Spatz IMDb, Gary Spatz Acting Coach, 142
Next: ObamaKare and utopian socialized medicine finally coming to AmeriKa
From: Mxsmanic on 19 Apr 2010 15:36 Martin writes: > The answer is that there are no formal criteria for quantity and particle size. So you don't go until there are such criteria. Simple.
From: EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) on 19 Apr 2010 17:26 Poetic Justice wrote: > EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote; > >> Really???? You actually think anyone with >> half a brain watches FOX for anything but >> laughs? > > I assume the sitcoms really suck this season then:-). Actually they DO (big-time)! > > Also Google "fox news ratings" or "fnc ratings" but you won't like the > results. Regards, Walter You're right, I don't "like" them, but it pretty much confirms my opinion of the deteriorating IQ of the average America. (There are times I think we deserve what we get, in terms of government - and am grateful I'm not likely to be around more than a maximum of twenty years more.)
From: EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) on 19 Apr 2010 17:33 Jean O'Boyle wrote: > "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:hqftvq1pkm(a)news5.newsguy.com... >> >> Jean O'Boyle wrote: >> >>> That's too bad or else you would know more about what is happening world >>> wide than you do. >>> If anyone is biased it's CBS, NBC and ABC. They put a spin on everything >>> they report. Maybe that is why their ratings have gone down so much >>> while FOX's have gone up...people are starting to think for themselves >> Really???? You actually think anyone with half a brain watches FOX for >> anything but laughs? > > Typical Evelyn. > Busy with "barbs" again even though you are the one complaining about the > lack of world news information with which I don't seem to have a problem. Perhaps the difference is that you are content with pablum whereas I prefer intellectual content! (Orwellian "double-speak" is alive and well - the trouble is, too few Americans nowadays recognize it when they encounter it.)
From: EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) on 19 Apr 2010 17:35 Jean O'Boyle wrote: > "erilar" <drache(a)chibardun.net.invalid> wrote in message > news:drache-6A29DB.19024518042010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi... >> In article <hqftok0pkm(a)news5.newsguy.com>, >> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >>> Martin wrote: >>>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:49:02 +0100, William Black >>>> <william.black(a)hotmail.co.uk> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote: >>>>> (Whatever >>>>>> happened to the cable news channels that broadcast ONLY news - "in >>>>>> depth", but NEWS, not comment?) >>>>> You obviously can't get BBC NEWS >>>> It's available on Internet. >>> Yes, and I'm thinking of subscribing, although I think there is a fee >>> involved. >> I've been reading BBC and German news on line without paying for it >> since G�tterd�mmerung began just as I was getting ready to fly to >> Germany. Crossing fingers for Tuesday. >> >> -- >> Erilar, biblioholic medievalist > > > I have always read BBC online and never paid for it, too. > > --Jean > I think the correct grammar is "never paid for it, either" >
From: EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) on 19 Apr 2010 17:38
Hatunen wrote: > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:12:20 +0200, Martin <me(a)address.invalid> > wrote: > >> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:28:37 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Martin writes: >>> >>>> It is a real shame that you discovered this so late in your life. >>> I've known it all my life, so it's not a discovery. >> You haven't managed not to snip relevant context after all these years of >> posting to news groups. >> >> So why didn't you stay in the USA? > > He prefers to pontficate on the evolving culture in the USA from > a safe distance rather than through personal experience. There are times when I envy him! (Unfortunately, with my retirement income all in U.S. Dollars, retiring abroad just wasn't feasible.) > |