From: Mxsmanic on
Wolfgang Schwanke writes:

> That was probably about the climatic effect. It's unlikely that
> aviation will be affected longer than a couple of days.

As long as there is ash in the air, aviation is affected. That could be a few
days ... or a few years.
From: Mark Brader on
Evelyn Gamble:
> > Wow! I realize the U.S. (especially the state of Arizona) is decidedly
> > insular, but you'd think something with that much international impact >
> > would at least have been MENTIONED on Wednesday's "Nightly News"!!!

Jean O'Boyle:
> You apparently have not been watching the right newcasts...I heard several
> times yesterday about the isolated volcano erruption in Iceland and today it
> was repeated numerous times and the effect of it air travel over the North
> Atlantic between US and Europe. It even showed rows of planes standing at
> Heathrow Airport not being able to fly ...

The header of Jean's posting shows it as posted 11:52 pm Thursday in
time zone -5 (presumably CDT in the US), so I assume her "yesterday"
means Wednesday.

> You must broaden your sources of news, Evelyn...it surely was there.
> You might try listening to more than one newscast.

Evelyn referred to Wednesday. Please indicate which newscasts on
*Wednesday* were showing lines of planes grounded at Heathrow, which
did not close until midday Thursday?
--
Mark Brader, Toronto "Don't anthropomorphize evolution:
msb(a)vex.net It hates that." --John Freiler

My text in this article is in the public domain.
From: William Black on
Mxsmanic wrote:
> William Black writes:
>
>> Not if I want to leave the UK mainland...
>
> You mean leave the UK for the mainland.

It's called 'the continent'.

I realise you're an American but please do try not to mangle the
language too badly.


--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.
From: EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) on


Jean O'Boyle wrote:
> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:hq81gq04tv(a)news6.newsguy.com...

>> Wow! I realize the U.S. (especially the state of Arizona) is decidedly
>> insular, but you'd think something with that much international impact >
>> would at least have been MENTIONED on Wednesday's "Nightly News"!!! We
>> got plenty of rehashing of political issues and the state's "budget
>> crisis", along with local crime news. Nary a WORD about Icelandic
>> volcanoes! Interesting that the news story mentions the effects of an
>> 1821 eruption lasting for two years - that was before jet aircraft. How
>> might a similar situation affect worldwide air travel, now?
>
>
> You apparently have not been watching the right newcasts...

And you obviously do not live in Arizona! There was SOME coverage today
on MSNBC (including an interview with a geologist), but most of what I
could find on CNN and FOX and other cable sources were their syndicated
talking heads with commentary on whatever they comment about. (Whatever
happened to the cable news channels that broadcast ONLY news - "in
depth", but NEWS, not comment?)
From: Hatunen on
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:29:46 +0200, Wolfgang Schwanke
<see(a)sig.nature> wrote:

>Hatunen <hatunen(a)cox.net> wrote
>in news:oc4hs5po710h5h3a0hc0s8sik3j4kub5t5(a)4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:54:08 +0200, Tom P <werotizy(a)freent.dd>
>> wrote:
>>>On the bright side, the German air traffic controllers have announced
>>>that, in view of the disruption caused by the volcano, they have decided
>>>to cancel the strike action that was planned for Monday.
>>>
>>>A case of every cloud has a silver lining.
>>
>> So, you think it's better if they strike when air traffic has
>> returned to normal?
>
>The strike will certainly be more effective then. :)

I suppose the desirability of this depends on how you feel about
such strikes...

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *