From: jt august on
In article <0guis5thlmo49fdmimpsnlahj69nhb49cf(a)4ax.com>,
Keane <keane(a)keanespics.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:53:01 -0500, Rudeney <rudeney(a)mickeypics.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Well, if wasn't Keane, then it must have been Rodney, right? And if it
> >wasn't Rodney, then it had to be Steve for sure! In fact, given that
> >we're talking about "flashing", I'm guessing it probably was Steve. But
> >then again, it could have been me and I just forgot about it.
>
> How'd I get first in line? I'm the new guy here.
>
> Keane

You've been making me laugh more recently. I respect that. It drives
the WifeBeast crazy at times, we're dealing with some form of stress of
another, and I'm dropping one liners every chance I get. She wants to
stay angry, and it hurts that she has to stop and laugh. but what's
life if you can't stop and laugh at it every chance you get?

jt
From: jt august on
In article <hqbhnk$fcf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
John Mc <John(a)tdcogre.com> wrote:

> I know and regardless of the TDC frivolity there was a wealth of
> information exchanged and decent discussion of all aspects of WDW. I
> wonder if the dropping of Usenet by so many ISP's hasn't taken it's
> toll on us.

As Disney Channel's Hannah Montana would say, "Yew think?!?"

jt
From: jt august on
In article <6vqis55vch9hjk58qfcask619lffl5gjsu(a)4ax.com>,
Keane <keane(a)keanespics.com> wrote:

> From a historical standpoint (not necessarily RADP, but Usenet in
> general), Usenet was brain-drained after the influx of the truly
> clueless. A lot of users went to moderated boards that filtered
> out spam and trolls. (Not easy to do early in the life of the 'net.)

That would have been the AOL/Hotmail wave. Actually, I attribute it
more to the clueless thinking WWW is all the internet has to offer. Ask
anyone who has gotten on the net after 2000, and most have never heard
of ftp, gopher, veronica, archie or finger, let alone nntp. And thanks
to microsoft rewriting the rules of e-mail protocols to allow HTML in
mail, these people thing e-mail is part of WWW also. That is the real
death of usenet.

jt
From: Ginny Favers on
On 4/17/2010 1:42 AM, John Mc wrote:
> Rudeney wrote:
>> jt august wrote:
>>> In article <14lbs5h3d2a07m41jalvn6hkvn16e29t3u(a)4ax.com>,
>>> Keane <keane(a)keanespics.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:47:19 -0500, jt august
>>>> <starsabre(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <1aef8804-4324-460e-b002-885079371fbf(a)x3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Mark L Fendrick <mark.fendrick(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh - for those pre-web days of the 'net! <G>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amazing how many of us from "way back" are still here. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark
>>>>> I never became a formal part of the Trimobia back then, but I date
>>>>> to the daze of rec.arts.diney, and I voted in favor of the split
>>>>> that created RADP.
>>>>>
>>>>> I more recently grabbed a TDC title when Keane offered up a good one.
>>>>>
>>>>> jt
>>>>> TDC - Flash Mountain Photographer and Keeper of all Banned Photos
>>>> Am I being blamed for something I didn't do again?
>>>>
>>>> (Looks like flashmountain still exists. Is it your site? :-))
>>>
>>> Perhaps it was Rodney.
>>
>> Well, if wasn't Keane, then it must have been Rodney, right? And if it
>> wasn't Rodney, then it had to be Steve for sure! In fact, given that
>> we're talking about "flashing", I'm guessing it probably was Steve.
>> But then again, it could have been me and I just forgot about it.
>>
>>> Someone through that out as a TDC title, and I had wanted one for
>>> some time, so I laid open claim to it. The Trimodian isn't as
>>> ceremonial as it once was (pity), and those who bestowed titles have
>>> all but disappeared.
>>
>> Oops! That's Trimo-B-ian! I think the Trimodians are those that have
>> the six-way flushing toilets. Hmmm, actually can we get some of those
>> installed in the pavilion?
>>
>>> Anyway, no objections were posted, so I kept it, although I don't use
>>> it much. I really enjoyed those TDC posts of old (and the FDC, too),
>>> and I keep hoping that *that magic* would come back. But then, I keep
>>> hoping for a return to vigor of the old classic video games newsgroup
>>> rec.games.video.classic, which - like RADP and RAD before it - use to
>>> get over 100 posts per day, sometimes close to 300 per day on weekends.
>>
>> I remember times when we had 300+ posts in a day and it took several
>> hours to "keep up". Now, I've been away for the last WEEK and there's
>> hardly been 200 posts!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I know and regardless of the TDC frivolity there was a wealth of
> information exchanged and decent discussion of all aspects of WDW. I
> wonder if the dropping of Usenet by so many ISP's hasn't taken it's toll
> on us.
>
> John Mc.

Hey, I'm still a wealth of info. Just ask me! Of course, by the time I
go back to WDW I probably won't know anything, it will have been so
long. :-(

~Amanda
From: John Mc on
Keane wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:42:13 -0400, John Mc <John(a)tdcogre.com> wrote:
>
>> I know and regardless of the TDC frivolity there was a wealth of
>> information exchanged and decent discussion of all aspects of WDW. I
>> wonder if the dropping of Usenet by so many ISP's hasn't taken it's
>> toll on us.
>>
>> John Mc.
>
> From a historical standpoint (not necessarily RADP, but Usenet in
> general), Usenet was brain-drained after the influx of the truly
> clueless. A lot of users went to moderated boards that filtered
> out spam and trolls. (Not easy to do early in the life of the 'net.)
>
> Have you ever looked up why Eternal September is called Eternal
> September? :-)
>
> Keane

Yes , the influx of college students to the internet every fall, right?

John

--
I always heard the road to Hell was paved with good intentions
But nobody told me it was a superhighway!