From: jeremyrh.geo on

Mxsmanic wrote:

> Which ones?

Those ones over there - him, him, and her.

B;

From: jeremyrh.geo on

Mxsmanic wrote:
> Dave Frightens Me writes:
>
> > Well, unlike other languages, English is defined by usage.
>
> English is not "defined by usage," nor is any other language.

What is it defined by? Unemployed IT geeks filling in as English
teachers?

B;

From: Mxsmanic on
Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:

> OK. Fine. But it may be /Aspir?/, right ?

Yes.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on
~* Magda ~* writes:

> What are you guys talking about?? All languages are defined by usage.

Someone forgot to explain that to Zamenhof and the IALA.

> Grammar can say what it likes; if people won't follow, then
> the *rules* have to change.

Grammar is not a person, so it says nothing. People follow the rules
of grammar because they cannot communicate with each other otherwise.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on
Le 15/07/2006, Mxsmanic a ?crit :
> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
>
>> OK. Fine. But it may be /Aspir?/, right ?
>
> Yes.

So, what was your point ? Do you have any advice on how to figure
whether a word common to French and English has a mute initial H ?

--
remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre
substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me