From: David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy on 18 Jul 2006 16:37 Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and > prestwich tesco 24h offy writes: > > > Like you said- hold that though. > > Though what? It's a typo, but you knew that. Liar. What are those rules by the way? We're still waiting, some with bated breath! -- David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
From: Dave Frightens Me on 18 Jul 2006 16:52 On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:37:05 +0100, this_address_is_for_spam(a)yahoo.com (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy) wrote: >Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and >> prestwich tesco 24h offy writes: >> >> > Like you said- hold that though. >> >> Though what? > >It's a typo, but you knew that. Liar. > >What are those rules by the way? We're still waiting, some with bated >breath! Haven't you realised that that speak doesn't affect him? -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- --
From: David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy on 18 Jul 2006 16:52 Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors(a)eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:37:05 +0100, this_address_is_for_spam(a)yahoo.com > (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and > prestwich tesco 24h offy) wrote: > > >Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and > >> prestwich tesco 24h offy writes: > >> > >> > Like you said- hold that though. > >> > >> Though what? > > > >It's a typo, but you knew that. Liar. > > > >What are those rules by the way? We're still waiting, some with bated > >breath! > > Haven't you realised that that speak doesn't affect him? It's not necessarily for him, though. I really couldn't care what his answer would be. The statement was stupid enough to begin with. He still didn't ask for the joke which explains why I keep on repeating things about him. -- David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
From: barney2 on 18 Jul 2006 16:56 In article <1hioqre.z0ssvl1lk1oujN%this_address_is_for_spam(a)yahoo.com>, this_address_is_for_spam(a)yahoo.com (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy) wrote: > *From:* this_address_is_for_spam(a)yahoo.com (David Horne, _the_ > chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h > offy) > *Date:* Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:19:57 +0100 > > <barney2(a)cix.compulink.co.uk> wrote: > > > In article > > <1himbpj.d83quo133gvolN%this_address_is_for_spam(a)yahoo.com>, > > this_address_is_for_spam(a)yahoo.com (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of > > the > > duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy) wrote: > [] > > > A lot of subsets of 'popular music' are certainly not 100% tonal- > > > e.g. > > > electronica. BTW, my electronica transcriptions (Boards of Canada, > > > Aphex > > > Twin and Squarepusher) will be in Paris (Cite de la Musique) on > > > October > > > 23 this year. > > > > Will you be wearing your craftsmanship on your sleeve again? I thought > > we'd warned you about that... > > Eh? Google "Horne sleeve Telegraph"!
From: barney2 on 18 Jul 2006 16:56
In article <f6gqb2hn15tdrnudfebdc2tpj3lokt5ig8(a)4ax.com>, mxsmanic(a)gmail.com (Mxsmanic) wrote: > *From:* Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> > *Date:* Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:13:12 +0200 > > barney2(a)cix.compulink.co.uk writes: > > > Are you suggesting fluency = correctness? > > No. Then can you expand on your response in the following exchange, which you snipped: barney: > > Do you suggest that somebody who does not know the difference in > > meaning is therefore not fluent in English? > mxsmanic: > I assert that he is not among the most fluent. If you are not drawing a conclusion as to the individual's fluency from the correctness of their language, what are you doing? Perhaps my use of the equals sign in the post that this follows up was hasty, but I take it that you are contending that correctness is a factor in fluency? |