From: EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) on


Mxsmanic wrote:

> EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) writes:
>
>
>>Actually, a less grating format would be "to Anthony and me"
>
>
> That is a question of style, not grammar.

No, it's a "question" of correct construction as opposed to
incorrect. (Or don;t you include sentence structure as part
of "grammar"?)
>

From: Mxsmanic on
David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and
prestwich tesco 24h offy writes:

> I imagine that's not a very taxing thing to do.

It mainly has the merit of being honest.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on
jeremyrh.geo(a)yahoo.com writes:

> What makes you imagine that?

It's not imagination. Personal attacks are one of many fallacies in
debate; people who resort to them erode their own positions.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: jeremyrh.geo on

Mxsmanic wrote:
> jeremyrh.geo(a)yahoo.com writes:
>
> > What makes you imagine that?
>
> It's not imagination. Personal attacks are one of many fallacies in
> debate; people who resort to them erode their own positions.

Indeed you do.

Another thing that erodes your position is dishonest snipping, and
ignoring issues where you have clearly been shown to be wrong.

B;

From: jeremyrh.geo on

Mxsmanic wrote:
> David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and
> prestwich tesco 24h offy writes:
>
> > I imagine that's not a very taxing thing to do.
>
> It mainly has the merit of being honest.

They do say "a change is as good as a rest".

B;