From: EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) on 19 Jul 2006 11:36 Mxsmanic wrote: > EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) writes: > > >>Actually, a less grating format would be "to Anthony and me" > > > That is a question of style, not grammar. No, it's a "question" of correct construction as opposed to incorrect. (Or don;t you include sentence structure as part of "grammar"?) >
From: Mxsmanic on 19 Jul 2006 12:33 David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy writes: > I imagine that's not a very taxing thing to do. It mainly has the merit of being honest. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 19 Jul 2006 12:33 jeremyrh.geo(a)yahoo.com writes: > What makes you imagine that? It's not imagination. Personal attacks are one of many fallacies in debate; people who resort to them erode their own positions. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: jeremyrh.geo on 19 Jul 2006 12:46 Mxsmanic wrote: > jeremyrh.geo(a)yahoo.com writes: > > > What makes you imagine that? > > It's not imagination. Personal attacks are one of many fallacies in > debate; people who resort to them erode their own positions. Indeed you do. Another thing that erodes your position is dishonest snipping, and ignoring issues where you have clearly been shown to be wrong. B;
From: jeremyrh.geo on 19 Jul 2006 12:53
Mxsmanic wrote: > David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and > prestwich tesco 24h offy writes: > > > I imagine that's not a very taxing thing to do. > > It mainly has the merit of being honest. They do say "a change is as good as a rest". B; |