air conditioning may be making us fat
in [Europe]
|
From: Mxsmanic on 19 Jul 2006 22:12 Dave Frightens Me writes: > And you go on to explain yourself, or do you just get less hours? It's not either-or. I explain the rule; there isn't any explanation for why the rule exists. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 19 Jul 2006 22:13 Dave Frightens Me writes: > You just admitted you are sometimes wrong. Yes, so? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 19 Jul 2006 22:14 Stanislas de Kertanguy writes: > You said there were no French fast food chains, I answered with > examples such as Paul and La Brioche dore. These are even mntioned in > the Paris Fast food section of your website (hence the name I gave to > the debate). Not everything in that section is a fast-food chain in the American sense. The French chains are mere approximations. I wouldn't call a place that sells mainly rolls and sandwiches and has no place to sit down and has slow service and no trays a fast-food chain. Even in the real fast-food chains in France, the service is so slow that they don't really qualify. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 19 Jul 2006 22:16 David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate writes: > This is a good example of your dishonesty. You said _universal_. What > are they? They are universal because people can distinguish music from noise. Without rules, that wouldn't be possible. Music uses tones and timbres that are pleasing to the ear and arranges them in mathematical relationships to each other that also are pleasing to the ear. Noise does not. Thus, music follows universal rules that distinguish it from noise. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
From: Mxsmanic on 19 Jul 2006 22:16
jeremyrh.geo(a)yahoo.com writes: > In other words, you don't admit to mistakes you make. I haven't made any mistakes in this context. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |