From: Dave Frightens Me on
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:13:15 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Dave Frightens Me writes:
>
>> You just admitted you are sometimes wrong.
>
>Yes, so?

You maintain a site that states otherwise. You cannot be always right
and sometimes wrong.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
From: Dave Frightens Me on
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:23:36 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Dave Frightens Me writes:
>
>> You would like to think so, but I suspect your shyness is directly
>> related to it, and is an obvious handicap for you.
>
>I don't see any connection.

Do something about your shyness, and you will see.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
From: Jim Ley on
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:16:32 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and
>deansgate writes:
>
>> This is a good example of your dishonesty. You said _universal_. What
>> are they?
>
>They are universal because people can distinguish music from noise.
>Without rules, that wouldn't be possible. Music uses tones and
>timbres that are pleasing to the ear and arranges them in mathematical
>relationships to each other that also are pleasing to the ear.

Except of course that would prevent amusia sufferers from being able
to identify music - since they would say tones out of this
mathematical relationship were just as pleasing as those within it.
so I'm afraid I cannot accept your definition of music above.

Jim.
From: Stanislas de Kertanguy on
Mxsmanic a pens trs fort :
> Music uses tones and
> timbres that are pleasing to the ear and arranges them in mathematical
> relationships to each other that also are pleasing to the ear. Noise
> does not.

That does not apply to atonal music, or to dodecaphonic music. The
latter does not match your point about being pleasing to the ear, and
its main rule is the equal importance given to the verticality and
horizontality.

You can say that you don't like those two kinds of music, that you
don't consider them as interesting, but that does not mean they don't
exist.

--
remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre
substitute "laposte" for "lesptt" to reach me


From: Mxsmanic on
Martin writes:

> Reality is an American aircraft airconditioning expert I spoke with.

Aircraft air-conditioning systems are different from terrestrial
systems.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.