If you think the princess thing is bad now
in [Disney Parks]
|
From: Patty on 23 Feb 2007 13:26 In article <1172242695.564068.234580(a)j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>, john.direwolf(a)gmail.com <john.direwolf(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >Anyone have a link to photos of the dresses that you don't have to >subscribe to the WSJ to get? According to one of the newspaper articles yesterday, Disney has an exclusive agreement with the WSJ and they aren't releasing any information to other sources yet. I imagine we'll get a look at them after that bridal show in NYC in April. Patty
From: john.direwolf on 23 Feb 2007 15:15 On Feb 23, 1:26 pm, Patty Winter (pat...(a)wintertime.com) wrote: > According to one of the newspaper articles yesterday, Disney has > an exclusive agreement with the WSJ and they aren't releasing > any information to other sources yet. Ah, I saw an article, on several different newspaper websites about them. But none of the sites had pictures. That explains it. I guess I shouldn't be looking at wedding dresses I think my wife would shoot me. :) johno
From: ElastiGirl on 23 Feb 2007 15:29 On Feb 23, 3:15 pm, "john.direw...(a)gmail.com" <john.direw...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 23, 1:26 pm, Patty Winter (pat...(a)wintertime.com) wrote: > > > According to one of the newspaper articles yesterday, Disney has > > an exclusive agreement with the WSJ and they aren't releasing > > any information to other sources yet. > > Ah, I saw an article, on several different newspaper websites about > them. But none of the sites had pictures. That explains it. > > I guess I shouldn't be looking at wedding dresses I think my wife > would shoot me. :) > > johno Unless you're promising to renew your vows at WDW and you want it to be SPECTACULAR! <wry grin> EG
From: john.direwolf on 23 Feb 2007 15:33 On Feb 23, 3:29 pm, "ElastiGirl" <mrmrsinc...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > Unless you're promising to renew your vows at WDW and you want it to > be SPECTACULAR! One horse drawn coach per decade is my rule about weddings. She got her's 2 years ago. So I think I'm off the hook for a while. johno
From: ElastiGirl on 23 Feb 2007 15:34
On Feb 23, 8:38 am, Denise <tinybee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > OK, I'm not a woman and maybe just genetically I'm missing something > > here. But if I WAS a woman I wouldn't want to play dress up as someone > > else on my wedding day. Wouldn't a woman want to be herself, the most > > beautiful bride in the world, and be so special nobody thinks of > > anyone but her that whole evening? > > I just wanted to be me! I had my $75 dress, I did my own hair, it was > really a nice wedding. No tiara for me. :) > > Denisewww.denisesfitnessblog.org/disneywww.neesie.org I had my dream dress -- looked like the dresses I drew all through school. My mom didn't realise as she was making it, when I put it on for the final fitting, she said "ohmigod! that's the dress you were always scribbling!" I made my "veil" -- a big floppy hat covered w/ the same lace as my dress, "pearls" that I had sewn on, and french net (that stuff with big holes) hanging down the back. Just what I wanted. EG |