Prev: what happened to a racist in vegas
Next: Lady Luck Grand Reopening!
From: Las Vegas Don on 1 Aug 2010 17:24
On Jul 31, 8:16 pm, tom ronson <theavlv.ron...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Las Vegas Don wrote:
> > He wis by only several hundred votes
>
> you know what Walt tells you about fact? why don't you listen to him.
> I've pointed it out on three previous occasions you're not right with
> that "stat" and yet you keep repeating it. you do know that repeating a
> lie doesn't turn it into truth --- right? nah --- what am I saying.
>
> --
>
>         --tr

Sorry Trout,

He does not win by a large margin. It might be a small amount larger
than several hundred, but a negligible amount in difference. Matter of
fact, if he did not have a semblance of a machine working with his
party voters he would not have won at all. He does not do that well
in the votes, or with the voters as a whole. He is not doing that
good of a job in his present position as well, ...well, he carries
water for the President real well.

How much did he win the last election by? I, now sadly, worked doing
door knocking that assisted him in his re-election a time or two. Is
it possible that I may have more info than you?? Give us the exact
number.
Don
From: Las Vegas Don on 1 Aug 2010 17:31
On Jul 31, 11:54 pm, tom ronson <theavlv.ron...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Walt wrote:
> > I must say it's been a pretty entertaining weekend so far.
>
> what's weird is the full moon was last weekend. oh well.
>
> --
>
>         --tr

Yes, and it sets Welt off. He is not normal. He has this twitch to
tell others things. If he feels he is right and you are wrong he
will stand up and tel the world that are 45 squares in the ceiling of
the State Mental Hospital, and not 43. Dear God in heaven....eh, give
him his space. He seems to need it.

If you post on a subject, he will read it and look for areas for him
to correct to his view. Not normal guys. The subject of room rates ,
buffets, anything, will be dragged to a fight by Walt. There is no
exchange of info for the benefit of tourists, and God bless them all.
This is not what people come here for. It does satisfy a
pharmacological / psychological need within Welt tho, I guess.

Don
From: fxd99 on 1 Aug 2010 17:31
Las Vegas Don wrote:
> On Jul 31, 8:16 pm, tom ronson <theavlv.ron...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Las Vegas Don wrote:
>>
>>>He wis by only several hundred votes
>>
>>you know what Walt tells you about fact? why don't you listen to him.
>>I've pointed it out on three previous occasions you're not right with
>>that "stat" and yet you keep repeating it. you do know that repeating a
>>lie doesn't turn it into truth --- right? nah --- what am I saying.
>>
>>--
>>
>> --tr
>
>
> Sorry Trout,
>
> He does not win by a large margin. It might be a small amount larger
> than several hundred, but a negligible amount in difference. Matter of
> fact, if he did not have a semblance of a machine working with his
> party voters he would not have won at all. He does not do that well
> in the votes, or with the voters as a whole. He is not doing that
> good of a job in his present position as well, ...well, he carries
> water for the President real well.
>
> How much did he win the last election by? I, now sadly, worked doing
> door knocking that assisted him in his re-election a time or two. Is
> it possible that I may have more info than you?? Give us the exact
> number.
> Don
He's already given you 'exact numbers' on more than one occasion. You
obviously have no comprehension. AND the poll that is the subject of
this thread is NOT about Harry Reid. You obviously didn't read the article.
Denny in Mass
From: Gary on 1 Aug 2010 17:55
On 8/1/2010 4:31 PM, fxd99(a)NOSPAMverizon.net wrote:

> He's already given you 'exact numbers' on more than one occasion. You
> obviously have no comprehension. AND the poll that is the subject of
> this thread is NOT about Harry Reid. You obviously didn't read the article.
> Denny in Mass

fxd99(a)NOSPAMverizon.net,

That's one of the things I love about Strevel. His total inability to
follow along in a thread or stick to the subject at hand. In this
particular case, he not only got the person mentioned in the article
wrong (Rory Reid, not Harry Reid), he called Tom Ronson "Trout", who
hasn't been on avlv in over 18 months. Ronson has given him the exact
numbers on Harry Reid's election results at least 3 or 4 times, but
Strevel has yet to read what Ronson has posted. He has an innate ability
to disconnect from the reality of a post and yet respond in his unique
frontier gibberish.

I'll try and save Ton the typing again. Here Don, just for you... again.

United States Senate election in Nevada, 1986[7]:

* Harry Reid (D) - 130,955 (50.00%)
* James Santini (R) - 116,606 (44.52%)
* None of the Above - 9,472 (3.62%)
* H. Kent Cromwell (LBT) - 4,899 (1.87%)

Democratic primary for the United States Senate from Nevada, 1992[8]:

* Harry Reid (inc.) - 64,828 (52.82%)
* Charles Woods - 48,364 (39.40%)
* None of These Candidates - 4,429 (3.61%)
* Norman E. Hollingsworth - 3,253 (2.65%)
* God Almighty (actually Emil Tolotti Jr.) - 1,869 (1.52%)

United States Senate election in Nevada 1992[9]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 253,150 (51.05%)
* Demar Dahl (R) - 199,413 (40.21%)
* None of the Above - 13,154 (2.65%)
* Joe S. Garcia, Sr. (Independent American) - 11,240 (2.27%)
* Lois Avery (Natural Law) - 7,279 (1.47%)
* H. Kent Cromwell (LBT) - 7,222 (1.46%)
* Harry Tootle (Populist) - 4,429 (0.89%)

United States Senate election in Nevada, 1998[10]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 208,650 (47.88%)
* John Ensign (R) - 208,222 (47.78%)
* None of the Above - 8,125 (1.86%)
* Michael Cloud (LBT) - 8,044 (1.85%)
* Michael E. Williams (Natural Law) - 2,749 (0.63%)

United States Senate election in Nevada, 2004[11]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 494,805 (61.08%)
* Richard Ziser (R) - 284,640 (35.14%)
* None of the Above - 12,968 (1.60%)
* Tom Hurst (LBT) - 9,559 (1.18%)
* David K. Schumann (Independent American) - 6,001 (0.74%)
* Gary Marinch (Natural Law) - 2,095 (0.26%)

so, in just one of his races (1998) he won by a "razor thin" margin. the
rest have been very comfortable wins.

Gary


"Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own
father can make you live forever if you telepathically tell him you
accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul
that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a
talking snake to eat from a magical tree..... yeah, makes perfect sense."
From: Gary on 1 Aug 2010 20:35
On 8/1/2010 4:24 PM, Las Vegas Don wrote:
> On Jul 31, 8:16 pm, tom ronson<theavlv.ron...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Las Vegas Don wrote:
>>> He wis by only several hundred votes
>>
>> you know what Walt tells you about fact? why don't you listen to him.
>> I've pointed it out on three previous occasions you're not right with
>> that "stat" and yet you keep repeating it. you do know that repeating a
>> lie doesn't turn it into truth --- right? nah --- what am I saying.
>>
>> --
>>
>> --tr
>
> Sorry Trout,
>
> He does not win by a large margin. It might be a small amount larger
> than several hundred, but a negligible amount in difference. Matter of
> fact, if he did not have a semblance of a machine working with his
> party voters he would not have won at all. He does not do that well
> in the votes, or with the voters as a whole. He is not doing that
> good of a job in his present position as well, ...well, he carries
> water for the President real well.
>
> How much did he win the last election by? I, now sadly, worked doing
> door knocking that assisted him in his re-election a time or two. Is
> it possible that I may have more info than you?? Give us the exact
> number.
> Don

Not in Las Vegas Don,

United States Senate election in Nevada, 1986[7]:

* Harry Reid (D) - 130,955 (50.00%)
* James Santini (R) - 116,606 (44.52%)
* None of the Above - 9,472 (3.62%)
* H. Kent Cromwell (LBT) - 4,899 (1.87%)

Democratic primary for the United States Senate from Nevada, 1992[8]:

* Harry Reid (inc.) - 64,828 (52.82%)
* Charles Woods - 48,364 (39.40%)
* None of These Candidates - 4,429 (3.61%)
* Norman E. Hollingsworth - 3,253 (2.65%)
* God Almighty (actually Emil Tolotti Jr.) - 1,869 (1.52%)

United States Senate election in Nevada 1992[9]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 253,150 (51.05%)
* Demar Dahl (R) - 199,413 (40.21%)
* None of the Above - 13,154 (2.65%)
* Joe S. Garcia, Sr. (Independent American) - 11,240 (2.27%)
* Lois Avery (Natural Law) - 7,279 (1.47%)
* H. Kent Cromwell (LBT) - 7,222 (1.46%)
* Harry Tootle (Populist) - 4,429 (0.89%)

United States Senate election in Nevada, 1998[10]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 208,650 (47.88%)
* John Ensign (R) - 208,222 (47.78%)
* None of the Above - 8,125 (1.86%)
* Michael Cloud (LBT) - 8,044 (1.85%)
* Michael E. Williams (Natural Law) - 2,749 (0.63%)

United States Senate election in Nevada, 2004[11]:

* Harry Reid (D) (inc.) - 494,805 (61.08%)
* Richard Ziser (R) - 284,640 (35.14%)
* None of the Above - 12,968 (1.60%)
* Tom Hurst (LBT) - 9,559 (1.18%)
* David K. Schumann (Independent American) - 6,001 (0.74%)
* Gary Marinch (Natural Law) - 2,095 (0.26%)

The person you were replying to is Tom Ronson. Not "Trout".

The fact that you campaigned for a man you feel is not qualified shows
that you have no morals or scruples. How does it feel knowing that you
helped put him and keep him in office?

Makes me laugh out loud at you. The thought of you walking around
holding up a Reid campaign sign and yelling all day long brings laughter
to my heart. Compounded now by the 180 you've done. Too bad you won't be
able to vote against him now that you no longer live in Nevada.


Gary

"Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own
father can make you live forever if you telepathically tell him you
accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul
that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a
talking snake to eat from a magical tree..... yeah, makes perfect sense."
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: what happened to a racist in vegas
Next: Lady Luck Grand Reopening!