ronson, gary, don, et. al, what would happen?
in [Las Vegas]
|
From: JRogow on 31 Jul 2010 10:47 Walt wrote: > In article <i302kp02a6t(a)news3.newsguy.com>, JRogow <jrogow(a)newsguy.com> wrote: > >> tom ronson wrote: >>> CLM in ND wrote: >>> >>>> If JP's in Southern Denmark, maybe he can say hello to Thomas. >>> probably not, if Thomas sees a Robin Leech look alike headed his way >>> that is. <grin> >>> >>> now there's your polar opposites. Thomas -- smart, educated, thoughtful, >>> compassionate, even tempered, not nuts. then there's Payton. ugh. >>> >> You forgot to mention that Thomas is handsome. > > And he cares about what his wife thinks. And has never denigrated other races, religions or cultures.
From: Walt on 31 Jul 2010 16:57 In article <715c98b5-4720-4b95-8089-a86ce10de357(a)b4g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, "Ace*" <avlvsveryown(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 31, 1:35�am, Walt <n...(a)none.void> wrote: > > > > > This just in... "Ace Against Freedom of Speech." > > Okay, I'll embrace that freedom by relentlessly flaming you to no end > - how's that, better? > > A* You care what I think?
From: Las Vegas Don on 31 Jul 2010 17:42 On Jul 30, 10:10 pm, Walt <n...(a)none.void> wrote: > In article <0d45acb4-3d31-44de-a468-f310d5870...(a)j9g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > Las Vegas Don <dstre...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Walt <n...(a)none.void> wrote: > > > In article > > > <14cd8a8a-b3f5-4ea6-a48b-d12378a73...(a)i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, > > > Las Vegas Don <dstre...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > As soon as I get back home due to my "footses" healed up the volume > > > > should go down. I am in the house most of the day and am bored. You > > > > can only pick your nose so many times before it hurts and I have to > > > > stop. :) Don't go there, it would be funny, but don't go there. :) > > > > Don, I may pick on you for certain stuff you write, but when it comes to > > > health > > > matters, I wish you only the best. > > > > --- Walt > > > Thanks, I appreciate that. See, we have that in common as I wish me > > only the best as well, hahahaha. And I apologise for the impolite > > posts. > > > Now, layoff please. :) > > Sorry, no can do! Facts are facts, and anybody who gets them wrong is subject to > correction or disagreement here, including me. If you look back at any of my > critical posts, they always start with a factual disagreement about something you > posted which I believed to be incorrect or misleading. Same goes for other people > who have criticized you in the past. Get the facts straight and you will render all > critics speechless. > > --- Walt Walt, Ever gone to a restaurant and ordered food? You then have a person from behind you tell you that your food order was wrong? To them, it is wrong because it is not something that they would not order, something that they had not seen on the new menu, or perhaps it was a food item that was being made for the individual ordering . That person that was correcting your order...how would you view them? They would pound the table and proclaim their correctness. Yet, it really is not their place to do anything but eat their food, leave a tip if it is warranted, and get the hell on with their life. No one in the restaurant ask them, nor are they expected to do more. They may be operating under the misconception that their services are values and/ or even needed when in fact they are forced upon the group and received as an imposition. In our group we have as our purpose sharing of Las Vegas information. Due to the unmoderated nature of our group we very frequently get off into the weeds and do everything but discuss Las Vegas. Your argumentative nature,and your desire to correct everyone on issues on the level of number of white lines in the street on Sahara from Boulder Hiway to the State Building across from the Kmart is divisive and causes the group to serve no ones need but to satisfy your argumentative desires. You would even want to argue where it is no longer called Charleston and becomes Boulder Hiway. That behavior pattern satisfies a need within you, but no one else in the ng. You are satisfying a need to be right that is not being met in your life in other aspects. Perhaps you do not bring it up to the person that is doing this to you because it is not safe to do so. So you bring it into this ng because you knoe that people cannot get their knuckles around your neck here. That is neither normal nor productive behavior Walt. If you continue this behavioral patten in this ng Walt, mark my word, people will continue to marginalize you to the point that you will no longer exist as a productive member of the group. Your loss of relevance will not be due to others being mean to you, but because they do not want to interact with you. You have not been elected by a majority of any registered number of any group to be the resident Nazi. If you want to be appreciated by the members of the group stop being as you are now. Stop throwingsand in the sandbox and play nice. Yhe ball is in your court. It does not effect me or anyone in the group but you. Don ..
From: Las Vegas Don on 31 Jul 2010 17:46 On Jul 31, 3:57 pm, Walt <n...(a)none.void> wrote: > In article <715c98b5-4720-4b95-8089-a86ce10de...(a)b4g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, > > "Ace*" <avlvsvery...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 31, 1:35 am, Walt <n...(a)none.void> wrote: > > > > This just in... "Ace Against Freedom of Speech." > > > Okay, I'll embrace that freedom by relentlessly flaming you to no end > > - how's that, better? > > > A* > > You care what I think? No one cares what any of think. Be nice and stop throwing sand in the sand box. Don
From: Walt on 31 Jul 2010 19:34
In article <b696282c-936e-4a41-b071-154c3c919688(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Las Vegas Don <dstrevel(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 30, 10:10�pm, Walt <n...(a)none.void> wrote: > > In article > > <0d45acb4-3d31-44de-a468-f310d5870...(a)j9g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > �Las Vegas Don <dstre...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 30, 2:31�pm, Walt <n...(a)none.void> wrote: > > > > In article > > > > <14cd8a8a-b3f5-4ea6-a48b-d12378a73...(a)i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, > > > > �Las Vegas Don <dstre...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > As soon as I get back home due to my "footses" healed up the volume > > > > > should go down. �I am in the house most of the day and am bored. �You > > > > > can only pick your nose so many times before it hurts and I have to > > > > > stop. :) �Don't go there, it would be funny, but don't go there. :) > > > > > > Don, I may pick on you for certain stuff you write, but when it comes > > > > to > > > > health > > > > matters, I wish you only the best. > > > > > > � �--- Walt > > > > > Thanks, I appreciate that. �See, we have that in common as I wish me > > > only the best as well, hahahaha. �And I apologise for the impolite > > > posts. > > > > > Now, layoff please. :) > > > > Sorry, no can do! �Facts are facts, and anybody who gets them wrong is > > subject to > > correction or disagreement here, including me. �If you look back at any of > > my > > critical posts, they always start with a factual disagreement about > > something you > > posted which I believed to be incorrect or misleading. �Same goes for other > > people > > who have criticized you in the past. �Get the facts straight and you will > > render all > > critics speechless. > > > > � �--- Walt > > Walt, > Ever gone to a restaurant and ordered food? You then have a person > from behind you tell you that your food order was wrong? To them, it > is wrong because it is not something that they would not order, > something that they had not seen on the new menu, or perhaps it was a > food item that was being made for the individual ordering . That > person that was correcting your order...how would you view them? They > would pound the table and proclaim their correctness. Yet, it really > is not their place to do anything but eat their food, leave a tip if > it is warranted, and get the hell on with their life. No one in the > restaurant ask them, nor are they expected to do more. They may be > operating under the misconception that their services are values and/ > or even needed when in fact they are forced upon the group and > received as an imposition. You confuse facts with personal taste. Facts are either correct or incorrect. Personal taste is just opinion. I don't challenge your opinions, just your facts. It seems you're unable to understand that distinction. That's all this is about. > In our group we have as our purpose sharing of Las Vegas information. > Due to the unmoderated nature of our group we very frequently get off > into the weeds and do everything but discuss Las Vegas. Your > argumentative nature,and your desire to correct everyone on issues on > the level of number of white lines in the street on Sahara from > Boulder Hiway to the State Building across from the Kmart is divisive > and causes the group to serve no ones need but to satisfy your > argumentative desires. You would even want to argue where it is no > longer called Charleston and becomes Boulder Hiway. That behavior > pattern satisfies a need within you, but no one else in the ng. You > are satisfying a need to be right that is not being met in your life > in other aspects. Perhaps you do not bring it up to the person that > is doing this to you because it is not safe to do so. So you bring it > into this ng because you knoe that people cannot get their knuckles > around your neck here. That is neither normal nor productive behavior > Walt. See above. > If you continue this behavioral patten in this ng Walt, mark my word, > people will continue to marginalize you to the point that you will no > longer exist as a productive member of the group. Your loss of > relevance will not be due to others being mean to you, but because > they do not want to interact with you. You have not been elected by a > majority of any registered number of any group to be the resident > Nazi. If you want to be appreciated by the members of the group stop > being as you are now. Stop throwingsand in the sandbox and play nice. > > Yhe ball is in your court. It does not effect me or anyone in the > group but you. See above. --- Walt |