Actual vacation homes within WDW property?
in [Disney Parks]
|
From: jt august on 25 Jun 2010 19:59 In article <i02s0q$f6s$2(a)rudeney.motzarella.org>, Rudeney <rudeney(a)mickeypics.com> wrote: > Most of the rules make sense and we enjoy > knowing that our neighbors aren't able to anything "weird". Weird is good. Covenants are evil. A friend of mine says they make mini-dictatorships out of otherwise trustworthy Amerikans - er - Americans. jt
From: jt august on 25 Jun 2010 20:00 In article <student-50DE80.20151424062010(a)news.aioe.org>, Meerkat1 <student(a)invalid.edu> wrote: > As far as Golden Oak goes, before the Pavilion joins in some kind of > communal ownership arrangement an acceptable arrangement for > cleaning/housekeeping must be in place. Again, that is what the Queen's Pirates are for. jt
From: Keane on 26 Jun 2010 06:28 On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Khyber Kym <jungleskip.kym(a)gmail.com> wrote: >First of all - how would permanent residents react to nightly >fireworks disturbing them? Yes, the park was there first...but, look >at what has happened in Anaheim and the region around this Orange >County...people get feeling they are a city and the next thing you >know ordinances start happening and the theme parks start getting >reeled in. Ha. It's not only the park, it's airports, railroads, expressways... All in existence before the housing developments, yet the people complain about the noise, much of which is abated with taxpayer dollars. But I digress. But this development is quite a distance from both MK and Epcot, and it's not to far from other developments that haven't complained yet. Heck, if I lived there, I'd want a clear view of both Epcot and MK from the top floor of the place... Now I wanna know what happens when that sinkhole opens up. >This was the reason Walt wanted the property in Florida - to be able >to do whatever he wanted without the imposition of tacky motels and >hotels WDW failed that when they built All Stars. HAhahahaha... (Okay, maybe not always tacky, but garish...) >This is just giving the idle rich the chance to live forever in la-la >land on Disney Property and become even more empowered in their >ownership and privileged takes on the parks. Well, count me in as wanting to be in the idle rich category. How come I didn't have any wealthy uncles? > And, for the Company to >find more ways to line their purses with gold.... If I could find a way that with minimal effort I could get people to throw money at me, there's a pretty good chance I'd do it. I'm sure people are beating at their door right now. I think there's a demand for this, 7 figure prices or not. Golden Oak looks like it's in the Northeast corner of the property, no place close to anything except the golf courses. They're building it slowly, so if demand goes away, they just don't build. Now, I'd be complaining if they put it where I think the 5th gate should be... ;-) Depending on what the rules for Golden Oak is, I can see a lot of corporations buying these. Think sport stadium skybox type perks. Maybe contest winners. Maybe Disney can zone the property between private and corporate owners... (I still haven't gotten any donations for the $25K to be put on the list...) Keane -- When stars are born, They possess a gift or two, One of them is this, They have the power to make a wish come true... -- Wishes Visit my site: http://keanespics.com
From: Keane on 26 Jun 2010 06:54 On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:58:04 -0700 (PDT), Caren <drizzt(a)sgi.net> wrote: >On Jun 24, 12:43�pm, Peppermint Patty <patriciabarbe...(a)gmail.com> >wrote: >> > We did something similar at the beach. �Right after, they changed the >> > rules so that subsequent sales may not be owned by a corporation, trust >> > or group of more than three people. �I'd assume they'd have similar >> > provisions to keep out the riff-raff. >> >> Hey, are you insinuating that RADP members are riff-raff? �I know we >> have axe murderers but come on - riff raff??? �Surely you jest. > >RADP has NEVER had an axe murderer. Pyromaniacs, kleptomaniacs, and >megalomaniacs: yes; axe murders: no. Did you really look around at RADP 13? I need to fix your sentence: >RADP has NEVER had an admitted axe murderer. Pyromaniacs, kleptomaniacs, and >megalomaniacs: yes; axe murders: none convicted. Keane -- When stars are born, They possess a gift or two, One of them is this, They have the power to make a wish come true... -- Wishes Visit my site: http://keanespics.com
From: Rudeney on 26 Jun 2010 10:31
jt august wrote: > In article <i02s0q$f6s$2(a)rudeney.motzarella.org>, > Rudeney <rudeney(a)mickeypics.com> wrote: > >> Most of the rules make sense and we enjoy >> knowing that our neighbors aren't able to anything "weird". > > Weird is good. > > Covenants are evil. A friend of mine says they make mini-dictatorships > out of otherwise trustworthy Amerikans - er - Americans. The way I look at it, if you want weird, then buy into a neighborhood that's already weird. Our neighborhood is very uniform - sidewalks with rear garages on alleyways, and the houses are one of about a dozen different floor plans, but all with nearly identical external features. We aren't zero lot line, but we're close. So, I really don't see anyone who would want to live here unless this is what they want. I mean, why move into such a uniform, planned neighborhood if you want "weird"? -- - RODNEY Next WDW Vacation? Who knows! Need to know more about RADP (rec.arts.disney.parks)? http://www.radp.org http://allears.net/btp/radp_bk.htm http://allears.net/tp/abrev.htm Are you still accessing RADP via Google? Why? Get instructions on how to access to the "real" RADP Usenet Group here: http://meets.radp.org/usenet.htm |